首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 4 Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Systems
【24h】

Micro-Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of 4 Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Systems

机译:微型电脑断层摄影评估管运输和4种热处理镍钛系统的定心能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate and compare canal transportation and centering ability of 4 different root canal preparation systems produced with thermal treatments by means of micro-computed tomographic imaging. Methods: Eighty mesial canals of human extracted mandibular molars were selected based on similar morphologic parameters and were randomly assigned to 4 experimental groups (n = 20) according to the canal instrumentation technique: HyFlex CM (HCM [Coltene-Whaledent, Allstatten, Switzerland]), HyFlex EDM (HEDM [Coltene-Whaledent]), WaveOne Gold (WOG [Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland]), and OneCurve (OC [Micro-Mega, Besancon, France]). The specimens were scanned before and after root canal preparation using X-ray micro-computed tomographic imaging at a resolution of 19.9 mm. Apical transportation and centering ability were then analyzed at 3 different levels: 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex, representing the apical, midroot, and coronal thirds of the root, respectively. One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to statistically compare the groups. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: HCM caused less canal transportation than WOG at the 3-mm level in both the buccal and lingual canals (P<.05). Also, HCM resulted in less canal transportation than WOG and OC at the 7-mm level regarding lingual canals. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the groups when the mean centering ratios were compared. Conclusions: The 4 evaluated systems safely prepared root canals causing minimal canal transportation and producing relatively centered preparations. In terms of canal transportation, HCM performed better than WOG at the apical level and better than WOG and OC at the coronal level.
机译:介绍:本研究旨在通过微计算机断层成像评估和比较用热处理产生的4种不同根管制备系统的运输和定心能力。方法:基于类似形态参数选择80颗薄层的人提取的下颌臼齿,并根据运河仪器技术随机分配给4个实验组(N = 20):HYFLEX CM(HCM [COLTENE-WHALENENT,ALLSTATTEN,SWITSTATTEN) ),Hyflex EDM(HEDM [COLTENE-WHALENTENT]),Waveone Gold(Wog [Lentsply Sirona,Ballaigues,Switzerland])和Onecurve(OC [Micro-Mega,Fesancon,France])。使用X射线微计算机断层成像之前和之后扫描标本,其分辨率为19.9毫米。然后,在3种不同的水平下分析顶端运输和定心能力:3毫米,5毫米和7毫米,分别代表根的顶端,中间体和冠状三分之一。使用单向分析和Kruskal-Wallis测试用于统计比较组。显着性水平设定为5%。结果:HCM在口腔和舌穴中的3毫米级别造成的运河较少(P <.05)。此外,HCM导致管道运输较少,而在7毫米水平上的曲线和OC的运输较少。在比较平均定性比率时,在组之间没有记录统计学上显着的差异。结论:4种评估系统安全地制备的根部运输,导致最小的运河运输和产生相对居中的制剂。就运河运输而言,HCM在顶端水平上比浪浪更好,而且比冠状水平更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号