...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Endodontics: Official Journal of American Association of Endodontists >Comparative Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Sealing Quality of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus Apical Plugs Placed with Various Techniques
【24h】

Comparative Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Sealing Quality of ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus Apical Plugs Placed with Various Techniques

机译:比较微型微型计算机断层性评价Proroot MTA和MTA Angelus Apick插头的密封质量,具有各种技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: This study compared the effects of different mixing and placement techniques on sealing of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and MTA Angelus (Solucoes Odontologicas, Londrina, Brazil) apical plugs using micro computed tomographic (micro-CT) imaging. Methods: Standardized divergent open apex models were created using 120 extracted maxillary incisors and divided into 8 groups (n = 15). ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus were mixed manually or mechanically and introduced to form apical plugs by hand condensation or indirect ultrasonic activation for 10 seconds. The samples were scanned using micro-CT imaging, and volumetric analysis of the voids between the dentin walls and the apical plugs and the porosity inside MTA was performed. Results: Irrespective of the mixing and placement techniques used, the voids between the dentin walls and the apical plugs in the MTA Angelus groups were greater than those in the ProRoot MTA groups (P < .05). The mechanically mixed groups were significantly less porous than the manually mixed groups (P < .05). Combined mechanical mixing and indirect ultrasonic activation yielded a less porous structure for both types of MTA than combined manual mixing and hand condensation (P < .05). Marginal adaptation for ProRoot MTA, both mixed and placed manually, was greater than for MTA Angelus (P < .05), but no difference was found when indirect ultrasonic activation was performed (P > .05). Conclusions: ProRoot MTA showed better marginal adaptation than MTA Angelus. Mechanically mixed products had better handling characteristics than the manually mixed product. Indirect ultrasonic activation did improve the adaptation of manually mixed MTA Angelus to the dentin walls.
机译:介绍:本研究比较了不同混合和放置技术对Proroot MTA(Lentply Maillefer,Ballaigues,Switzerland)和MTA Angelus(Solucodo Odontologicas,Londrina,Bladrina,Blazil)顶端插头的影响的影响。方法:使用120提取的上颌门牙创建标准化的发出开放APEX模型,并分为8组(n = 15)。 Proroot MTA和MTA Angelus手动或机械混合,并通过手工冷凝或间接超声波激活来形成顶端塞10秒。使用微型CT成像扫描样品,并进行牙本质壁与顶端塞之间的空隙的体积分析,并且MTA内部的孔隙率。结果:不管使用的混合和放置技术如何,牙本质壁和MTA Angelus基团中的顶端之间的空隙大于Proroot MTA基团(P <.05)中的空隙。机械混合基团比手动混合的基团显着较小(P <.05)。组合的机械混合和间接超声波活化产生的是两种MTA的多孔结构,而不是组合手动混合和手工冷凝(P <.05)。 Proroot MTA的边缘适应,混合和手动放置,大于MTA Angelus(P <.05),但在进行间接超声波激活时没有发现差异(p> .05)。结论:Proroot MTA显示比MTA Angelus更好的边缘适应。机械混合产品比手动混合产品具有更好的处理特性。间接超声波激活确实改善了手动混合MTA Angelus的适应牙本质墙壁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号