首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Coastal Conservation >Coastal scenery and litter impacts at Alicante (SE Spain): management issues
【24h】

Coastal scenery and litter impacts at Alicante (SE Spain): management issues

机译:Alicante(SE西班牙)的沿海风景和垃圾影响:管理问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Coastal scenery value was evaluated at 56 locations along the 244km long coast of Alicante (western Mediterranean) according to the methodology of Ergin et al. Area 36(4):367-386, (2004) based on the evaluation of 26 physical and anthropogenic parameters. Selected areas covered remote (10), rural (9), village (15) and urban (22) bathing areas. The scenery Decision Value parameter (D), allowed to classify the investigated sites into 5 classes, from Class I (extremely attractive/natural sites) to Class V (very unattractive/urbanized sites): 2 sites belonged to Class I, 6 to Class II, 14 to Class III, 20 to Class IV and 14 to Class V. Litter presence was assessed at the same sites using the EA/NALG (2000) methodology, which allowed to classify each site in four grades: A: very good (40 sites); B: good (14); C: fair (1) and D: poor (1). In urban sites litter was composed by small items related to land-based sources and beach use while litter in natural sites was related to marine-based sources, essentially fishing. The sector analysis methodology highlighted as most sites (33 out of 56) showed contradictory characteristics for litter/scenic grades/beach awards presence. To improve scenic value, different actions have to be carried out according to the site typology. At many urban sites, actuations should be focused to the removing or reducing of beach utilities and unnecessary infrastructures. At rural and remote areas, is mandatory to carry out specific litter management plans to reduce litter presence.
机译:根据Ergin等人的方法,沿着Alicante(西部地中海)的244公里沿岸的56个地点评估了沿海风景值。面积36(4):367-386,(2004)基于26例物理和人为参数的评价。选定的区域覆盖偏远(10),乡村(9),村(15)和城市(22)沐浴区。景观决策值参数(d),允许将调查的站点分类为5级(非常有吸引力/自然网站)到V类(非常没有吸引力/城市化的网站):2个网站属于I类,6到课程II,14至III类,IV类和第14类至第14类至第14类。使用EA / NALG(2000)方法在同一地点进行评估,这使得四个等级分类:A:非常好( 40个网站); B:好(14); C:公平(1)和D:穷人(1)。在城市地点,垃圾由与陆地来源和海滩有关的小型物品组成,而自然网站的垃圾与基于海洋为基础的来源有关,基本上捕鱼。由于大多数地点(33分中为56分中的33个)突出显示的部门分析方法显示出垃圾/景区等级/海滩奖项存在的矛盾特征。为了提高景区值,必须根据网站类型进行不同的操作。在许多城市网站上,应专注于去除或减少海滩公用事业和不必要的基础设施。在农村和偏远地区,必须进行特定的垃圾管理计划,以减少垃圾的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号