首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology >To manualize, or not to manualize: Is that still the question? A systematic review of empirical evidence for manual superiority in psychological treatment
【24h】

To manualize, or not to manualize: Is that still the question? A systematic review of empirical evidence for manual superiority in psychological treatment

机译:手动简化,或不手动提示:这仍然是这个问题吗? 对心理治疗中手动优势的经验证据进行系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

ObjectiveInstitutional promotion of psychotherapy manuals as a requirement for evidence-based treatments (EBTs) yields the assumption that manualized treatment is more effective than nonmanualized treatment. This systematic review examines empirical evidence for this claim.
机译:OfficeIteInstitional促进心理治疗手册作为证据的治疗要求(EBTS)产生的假设手动治疗比非人化治疗更有效。 这种系统审查审查了本索赔的经验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号