首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice >High-intensity interval training in the therapy and aftercare of cancer patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis
【24h】

High-intensity interval training in the therapy and aftercare of cancer patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

机译:癌症患者治疗和患者的高强度间隔训练:通过META分析进行系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PurposeThis review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared to usual care (UC) or moderate-intensity training (MIE) on physical fitness and health-related outcomes in cancer patients across all stages of therapy and aftercare.MethodsDatabases were systematically searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines until October 4th, 2018. Eligibility criteria included adult patients of various cancer types, performing HIIT vs. UC or MIE. Outcomes of interest included physical fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness [VO2peak] and functional capacity) and health-related outcomes (body composition, quality of life, cancer-related fatigue, and blood-borne biomarkers). Mean differences (MD) were calculated and pooled to generate effect sizes for VO2peak.ResultsThe search identified 1453 studies, out of which 12 articles were included. The average duration of interventions was 6.73.0weeks, with 2.80.5 sessions per week. The meta-analysis for VO2peak showed superiority of HIIT compared to UC (MD 3.73; 95% CI 2.07, 5.39; p<0.001) but not MIE (MD 1.36; 95% CI -1.62, 4.35; p=0.370). Similarly, no superior effects of HIIT compared to MIE were found for quality of life or changes in lean mass, while evidence was provided for a larger reduction in fat mass.Conclusion p id=Par4 This systematic review showed that short-term HIIT induces similar positive effects on physical fitness and health-related outcomes as MIE but seems to be superior compared to UC. Thus, HIIT might be a time-efficient intervention for cancer patients across all stages of therapy and aftercare.Implications for Cancer Survivors p id=Par5 High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior compared to usucal carein improving physical fitness and health-related outcomes in cancer patients across all stages of therapy and aftercare. Currently, there is no evidence for the benefits of HIIT compared to aerobic training of moderate intensity (MIE) for changes in cardiorespiratory fitness, lean mass and patient-reported outcomes. Reductions in fat mass may be more pronounced in HIIT compared to MIE when training is performed in aftercare.
机译:目的审查和荟萃分析旨在评估高强度间隔训练(HIIT)与常规护理(UC)或中等强度培训(MIE)对所有阶段的癌症患者身体健康和健康相关结果的影响的影响治疗和妊娠。根据PRISMA指南,在2018年10月4日之前系统地搜索了甲醛。资格标准包括各种癌症类型的成年患者,表演HIIT与UC或MIE。感兴趣的结果包括身体素质(心肺功能性[VO2Peak]和功能能力)和健康相关的结果(身体组成,生活质量,与癌症相关的疲劳和血型生物标志物)。计算和汇集平均差异(MD)以产生vo2peak.Resultsthe搜索的效果大小,确定了1453项研究,其中包括其中12篇文章。干预措施的平均持续时间为6.73.0周,每周2.80.5个课程。与UC(MD 3.73; 95%CI 2.07,5.39; P <0.001)而不是MIE(MD 1.36; 95%CI -1.62,4.35; p = 0.370,4.35; p = 0.370),vo2peak的荟萃分析显示了HIIT的优越性同样,没有发现与MIE相比的高质量的优越效果是为了质量的生命质量或瘦肉质量的变化,而脂肪质量的减少提供了较大的证据。结论P id = PAR4这种系统综述表明短期HIIT诱导相似与UC相比,对物理健康和与健康相关成果的积极影响,但似乎是优越的。因此,HIIT可能是癌症患者在治疗的所有阶段和伴随的癌症患者中疗效。用于癌症幸存者的实例P id = PAR5高强度间隔训练(HIIT)与USUCAL CAREIN改善身体健康和健康相关的优越癌症患者在治疗和伴随的各个阶段的结果。目前,与中等强度(MIE)的有氧培训相比,没有证据了HIIT的益处,用于中等强度(MIE),以进行心肺部受潮健身,瘦肉质量和患者报告的结果。与MIE在培训在追踪中进行培训时,脂肪质量的减少可能更加明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号