...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Vapocoolant Spray Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Radial Artery Cannulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
【24h】

Vapocoolant Spray Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Radial Artery Cannulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:吞咽喷射对径向动脉插管的Lidocaine渗透:前瞻性,随机,受控临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: Local infiltration with lidocaine is a frequently used measure to prevent pain during arterial cannulation. Its administration is associated with pain. Vapocoolants like ethyl chloride or alkanes also affect rapid-onset anesthesia. However, their administration causes less discomfort compared with administration of lidocaine. The effectiveness of vapocoolants in mitigating discomfort associated with arterial cannulation never has been studied. The authors therefore compared vapocoolant with lidocaine for reducing discomfort caused by arterial cannulation.
机译:目的:利多卡因局部渗透是一种常用的措施,以防止动脉插管期间疼痛。 它的给药与疼痛有关。 氯化乙基氯化物或烷烃等蒸气剂也影响快速发作麻醉。 然而,与Lid Caine的给药相比,他们的施用导致不适的不适。 研究了Vapomoolants在缓解与动脉插管相关的不适的有效性从未研究过。 因此,作者因此将潮湿法与利多卡因进行了比较,以减少动脉插管引起的不适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号