首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging studies >Epistemological erasure: The subject of abuse in the problematization of 'elder abuse'
【24h】

Epistemological erasure: The subject of abuse in the problematization of 'elder abuse'

机译:认识论擦除:“老年虐待”问题中滥用的主题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The academic field of literature pertaining to elder abuse emerges largely from gerontology with contributions from a variety of disciplines including geriatric medicine, nursing, public health, law, psychology, sociology and social work. This paper presents a critical review of articles drawn from this literature to identify current directions leading the development of empirical research in this field. The objective measurement of prevalence, the identification and correlation of psycho-social risk factors and practice-based research oriented to intervention and prevention are identified as privileged sites for scientific investigation. These sites are critically analysed in terms of their underpinning rationalities to reveal the operation of a hegemonic post-positivist epistemological framework. This framework enables an expert professional discourse to structure knowledge and the field of inquiry through constructions of the 'subject of abuse' as a statistical figure, a factorial subject of risk and universally vulnerable. These modes of representation preclude subjective lived experience and, in doing so, inaugurate an 'epistemological erasure' of the embodied subject of abuse. The review attends to the limited body of qualitative research in the field, some of which claims a politicized empiricism of 'voice'. However, whilst the findings produced by this research suggest theoretically and conceptually fertile lines of inquiry, these have not disrupted or extended the dominant discourses in the field. This paper argues that an epistemological gulf, riven through a politics of evidence, ensures the reproduction of dominant discourses and their attendant limitations in ways that forestall the conceptual and theoretical advancement of the field.
机译:与老年虐待的文学学术领域很大程度上来自Gerontology来自各种学科的贡献,包括老年医学,护理,公共卫生,法律,心理学,社会学和社会工作。本文提出了对从本文文献中汲取的文章的批判性审查,以确定当前方向导致该领域的实证研究发展。普遍存在的客观测量,心理社会危险因素和实践的研究鉴定为干预和预防的研究被确定为科学调查的特权网站。这些网站在其支撑性的理性方面受到严格分析,以揭示霸权后职员鉴定框架的运作。该框架使专家专家讨论能够通过建设的结构知识和探究领域,通过建设作为统计数据,风险的因子和普遍脆弱的因素。这些代表模式妨碍了主观的生活经验,并在这样做,揭开了滥用所体现的主题的“认识论擦除”。审查参加了该领域的有限的定性研究机构,其中一些声称是“声音”的政治化经验主义。然而,虽然这项研究产生的调查结果表明理论上和概念上肥沃的探究性,但这些都没有中断或延长了该领域的主导话语。本文认为,通过证据政治的宣传学士学位,确保了占据概念和理论地推进领域的思想致密的思想和他们的伴随的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号