首页> 外文期刊>Dreaming: journal of the Association for the Study of Dreams >Content Analysis of Chinese Dreams-Pleasure or Pain?
【24h】

Content Analysis of Chinese Dreams-Pleasure or Pain?

机译:中国梦想的内容分析 - 快乐还是痛苦?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Unlike dream reports around the world, Chinese people's dreams seem to display more pleasant affect and content. In view of this cultural disparity, the present study examined whether the predominance of unpleasant dream content revealed by Western studies using the Dream Threat Scale and the Hall and Van de Castle (1966) coding system could be replicated in a sample of dreams reported by Chinese people. The sample consisted of 252 most recently recalled dreams and 228 diary dreams collected from 286 Chinese participants over 3 consecutive nights. The employment of the Hall and Van de Castle system in dream coding was supplemented with the Good Fortune Scale and a neuroscientific-based classification of emotions to equalize the numbers of positive and negative coding categories. The analysis confirmed the results of previous similar research in other countries of a negativity bias in dreaming but did not lend support to the theory of threat simulation as a primary function of dreaming. The inherent limitations of content analysis were discussed in light of the present findings and the Chinese personality characteristics.
机译:与世界各地的梦想报道不同,中国人民的梦想似乎展现了更令人愉快的影响和内容。鉴于这种文化差异,本研究审查了西方学习使用梦想威胁规模和大厅和van de Castle(1966年)编码系统显示的令人不愉快的梦想内容的职称是否可以在汉语报告的梦想中复制人们。该样本由252人组成,最近召回的梦想和228名日记梦想从286名中国参与者收集,连续3个晚上。在梦想编码中的大厅和Van de Castle系统的就业补充了良好的财富规模和基于神经科学的情感分类,以平衡正负编码类别的数量。该分析证实了在梦中消极偏见的其他国家的先前类似研究的结果,但并未为威胁模拟理论提供支持作为梦想的主要功能。根据目前的研究结果和中国人格特征讨论了内容分析的固有局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号