...
首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders >Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: a validation study of the Brazilian version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD-Br).
【24h】

Functional disability in Alzheimer disease: a validation study of the Brazilian version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD-Br).

机译:阿尔茨海默病中的功能性残疾:巴西版《痴呆症残疾评估》(DAD-Br)的验证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The assessment of activities of daily living (ADL) is important both for the diagnosis and staging of dementia. The objective of this study was to verify the applicability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD-Br). METHODS: The DAD was applied to caregivers of 89 patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD) and to 40 elderly individuals without cognitive impairment (controls). We assessed the construct validity of the scale and its diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value). In addition, intergroup and intragroup analyses were conducted to characterize patient performance on basic and instrumental ADL and to determine underlying deficits (initiation, planning, or effective execution). RESULTS: AD patients and controls had mean ages of 76.4+/-6.9 years and 74.5+/-7.3 years (P=0.08), respectively. Mean Mini-Mental State Examination scores were 17.4+/-5.0 and 26.1+/-5.1 (P<0.001) and scores on the DAD were 68.4+/-19.0 and 99.8+/-0.9 (P<0.001), for patients and controls, respectively. The DAD scale showed good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.77) and correlation with the Mini-Mental State Examination (r=0.44; P<0.001). The AD group did better on basic ADL than on instrumental ADL (P<0.001). As expected, controls did not exhibit significant deficits on the items evaluated. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of the DAD is an adequate and reliable tool for assessing functional ability in AD patients.
机译:背景:对日常生活活动(ADL)的评估对于痴呆的诊断和分期都很重要。这项研究的目的是验证巴西版痴呆症残疾评估(DAD-Br)的适用性和有效性。方法:DAD用于89名可能患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的患者和40名无认知障碍的老年患者(对照)的护理人员。我们评估了量表的结构效度及其诊断准确性(敏感性,特异性和预测价值)。此外,还进行了组间和组内分析,以表征患者在基本和工具性ADL方面的表现,并确定潜在的缺陷(启动,计划或有效执行)。结果:AD患者和对照组的平均年龄分别为76.4 +/- 6.9岁和74.5 +/- 7.3岁(P = 0.08)。患者和患者的平均小精神状态检查得分分别为17.4 +/- 5.0和26.1 +/- 5.1(P <0.001),DAD得分分别为68.4 +/- 19.0和99.8 +/- 0.9(P <0.001)。控件。 DAD量表显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbachα= 0.77),并与小精神状态检查相关(r = 0.44; P <0.001)。 AD组在基础ADL方面比在仪器ADL方面表现更好(P <0.001)。如预期的那样,对照在所评估的项目上没有表现出明显的缺陷。结论:巴西版的DAD是评估AD患者功能能力的适当且可靠的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号