...
首页> 外文期刊>Disease markers >Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels Correlate with Severity of Retinopathy in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels Correlate with Severity of Retinopathy in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:血清血管内皮生长因子水平与糖尿病患者中视网膜病变的严重程度相关:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Investigations regarding serum and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) are conflicting. This meta-analysis is aimed at determining whether serum and plasma VEGF levels are associated with DR and its severity in diabetic patients. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were used to search for published studies, and serum and plasma VEGF levels were compared among DR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and nondiabetic retinopathy (NDR) patients. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using a random effects model. Results: A total of 29 studies comprising 1805 DR (or NPDR or PDR) patients and 1699 NDR patients were included. ELISA was used to evaluate serum or plasma VEGF levels in all except for two studies included in this meta-analysis. Overall, serum VEGF levels were significantly higher in DR patients (SMD: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.44-1.03) than those in NDR patients, while plasma VEGF levels were not in the comparison (SMD: 0.40, 95% CI: -0.13-0.92). Similarly, NPDR (SMD: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-0.80) and PDR (SMD: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.79-1.85) patients had higher serum VEGF levels compared with NDR patients, but the difference was not significant in plasma samples (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: -0.47-0.95; SMD: 0.37, 95% CI: -0.30-1.05). In addition, serum VEGF levels were higher in PDR patients than those in NPDR patients (SMD: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.41-1.33), but plasma VEGF levels were not (SMD: -0.00, 95% CI: -0.31-0.31). The subgroup and metaregression analysis revealed that the study location, study design, and publication year of a study have certain influence on heterogeneity between studies in serum or plasma samples. Conclusions: VEGF levels in the serum instead of those in the plasma correlate to the presence and severity of DR in diabetic patients. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these findings.
机译:背景技术:糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者的血清和血浆血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平的研究是矛盾的。该META分析旨在确定血清和血浆VEGF水平是否与糖尿病患者的博士及其严重程度相关。方法:采用PubMed and Embase搜索已发表的研究,并在DR,非增殖糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR),增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)和非糖尿病视网膜病变(NDR)患者中进行血清和血浆VEGF水平。使用随机效应模型汇集标准化平均差异(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共有29项组成,包括1805例(或NPDR或PDR)患者和1699名NDR患者。 ELISA用于评估血清或血浆VEGF水平,除了该荟萃分析中的两项研究。总体而言,患者血清VEGF水平显着高于NDR患者的患者(SMD:0.74,95%:0.44-1.03),而血浆VEGF水平不在比较中(SMD:0.40,95%CI:-0.13 -0.92)。同样,与NDR患者相比,NPDR(SMD:0.51,95%CI:0.22-0.80)和PDR(SMD:1.32,95%CI:0.79-1.85)患者具有更高的血清VEGF水平,但差异在血浆中不显着样品(SMD:0.24,95%CI:-0.47-0.95; SMD:0.37,95%CI:-0.30-1.05)。此外,PDR患者血清VEGF水平高于NPDR患者(SMD:0.87,95%CI:0.41-1.33),但血浆VEGF水平不(SMD:-0.00,95%CI:-0.31-0.31) )。亚组和沟通分析显示,研究的研究位置,研究设计和出版年份对血清或血浆样品的研究之间的异质性有一定的影响。结论:血清中的VEGF水平,而不是血浆中的那些与糖尿病患者博士的存在和严重程度相关。需要进一步的大规模研究来确认这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号