首页> 外文期刊>Alzheimer disease and associated disorders >A 24-week Randomized, Controlled Trial of Memantine in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Alzheimer Disease.
【24h】

A 24-week Randomized, Controlled Trial of Memantine in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Alzheimer Disease.

机译:中度至重度阿尔茨海默氏病患者的美金刚胺24周随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study examined the efficacy and safety of memantine monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer disease (AD). Patients not receiving a cholinesterase inhibitor (N=350) were randomized to receive memantine (20 mg/d) or placebo during this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Prospectively defined analyses failed to demonstrate a statistically significant benefit of memantine treatment compared with placebo on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB) at week 24 end point, although a significant advantage was observed for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. The 19-item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL19) did not differ significantly between groups in any analysis. Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input (CIBIC-Plus) did not significantly favor memantine at week 24 despite a significant advantage for memantine at weeks 12 and 18. Other secondary outcomes showed no significant treatment differences. Post hoc analyses of potentially confounding covariates and alternative methods of imputing missing data did not substantially alter the results. Because of the violations of normality assumptions for the SIB and ADCS-ADL19, nonparametric analyses were performed; statistically significant benefit of memantine over placebo was demonstrated at week 24 for the SIB but not the ADCS-ADL19. The type and incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups.
机译:这项研究检查了美金刚单一疗法对中度至重度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的疗效和安全性。在这项为期24周的双盲,安慰剂对照试验中,未接受胆碱酯酶抑制剂(N = 350)的患者被随机分配接受美金刚(20 mg / d)或安慰剂。尽管在第12周和第18周观察到美金刚有显着优势,但前瞻性分析未能证明美金刚在安慰剂上与安慰剂相比在严重受损电池(SIB)方面具有统计学上的显着优势,尽管在第24周时观察到美金刚有显着优势。每天的合作研究活动量表(ADCS-ADL19)在各组之间均无显着差异。尽管在第12周和第18周美金刚具有明显优势,但临床医生基于面试的变化印象加照顾者投入(CIBIC-Plus)在美金刚方面并没有明显偏爱美金刚。事后对潜在混淆的协变量的分析以及插补缺失数据的替代方法并没有实质性地改变结果。由于违反了SIB和ADCS-ADL19的正态性假设,因此进行了非参数分析。对于SIB,在第24周证实了美金刚相对于安慰剂有统计学意义的获益,但对于ADCS-ADL19没有。两组不良事件的类型和发生率相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号