首页> 外文期刊>Zuchtungs Kunde >Why excessive production standards and meat renunciation are not sustainable!
【24h】

Why excessive production standards and meat renunciation are not sustainable!

机译:为什么生产标准过度的生产标准和肉类放松不可持续!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The results of this contribution derived from numerical partial and general equilibrium models exhibit an extrem poor cost-benefit-ratio of tightened production standards, a meat-free diet and trade restrictions in Germany and the EU. Large producer income and social welfare losses are taken into account for at best marginal, sometimes even counterproductive, contributions to the environment and food security. Instead of unilaterally trying to change consumption and dietary preferences as well as introducing costly production standards and one-sided trade barriers at a national level, policy should focus on fully taking advantage of technological progress and innovation. These areas include plant and livestock breeding, animal feeding, livestock production, animal health as well as irrigation systems and soil management. Hence, policy should create the according framework for research and development. In this area, Germany and the EU still need to catch up.
机译:这种贡献的结果来自数值局部和一般均衡模型的突出性生产标准的极端成本效益 - 比率,德国和欧盟的无肉类饮食和贸易限制。 在最佳边际,有时甚至适得其反,环境和粮食安全的贡献,考虑到大型生产者收入和社会福利损失。 而不是单方面试图改变消费和饮食偏好以及在国家一级引入昂贵的生产标准和片面的贸易壁垒,政策应全面地利用技术进步和创新。 这些地区包括植物和牲畜育种,动物饲养,畜牧业生产,动物健康以及灌溉系统和土壤管理。 因此,政策应根据研究和开发框架创建。 在这个领域,德国和欧盟仍然需要赶上来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号