首页> 外文期刊>Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology >A review of the taxonomy and systematics of the echinoid genus Monostychia Laube, 1869
【24h】

A review of the taxonomy and systematics of the echinoid genus Monostychia Laube, 1869

机译:1869年类sty虫类的分类学和系统学研究述评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A review of Monostychia, a stratigraphically important clypeasteroid echinoid genus in southern Australian Oligocene/Miocene strata, reveals uncertainty in relation to morphological features used in taxonomy. The result is that the exact systematic position of the genus remains unresolved at subfamily level. Monostychia and its type species, M. australis, are redescribed. Monostychia australis is restricted to the lower to middle Miocene Glenforslan Formation of the Murray Basin. Three other species currently within Monostychia, M. etheridgei, M. loveni and M. elongata, are discussed. Although it is concluded that M. etheridgei belongs in the genus and is a distinct species, the taxonomic position of M. loveni is questioned, and the validity of M. elongata as a separate species from M. australis remains uncertain. This work lays the foundation for further revisions of Monostychia with an expectation that such work will provide the basis for character determination that may be useful across other echinoid taxa.
机译:对澳大利亚南部渐新世/中新世地层中具有重要地层意义的类豌豆类类固醇类的Monestychia的回顾表明,在分类学中使用的形态学特征存在不确定性。结果是该属的确切系统位置在亚科水平上仍未得到解决。重新描述了单眼气单胞菌及其类型种。澳洲monostychia australis仅限于Murray盆地的中新世Glenforslan组的中下部。讨论了目前在Monostychia内的另外三个物种,M。etheridgei,M。loveni和M. elongata。尽管得出的结论是,埃瑟里奇氏菌属于该属并且是一个独特的物种,但对洛夫尼氏菌的分类学地位提出了质疑,而长叶曼氏菌作为独立于澳大利亚莫氏菌的物种的有效性仍然不确定。这项工作为进一步改良Monostychia奠定了基础,并期望此类工作将为确定性状提供基础,这可能会在其他类棘突类生物群中发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号