首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Evaluation of Novel Disposable, Light-Weight Radiation Protection Devices in an Interventional Radiology Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Evaluation of Novel Disposable, Light-Weight Radiation Protection Devices in an Interventional Radiology Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:介入放射学环境中新型一次性轻型辐射防护装置的评估:随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. Radiation exposure to interventionalists is increasing. The currently available standard radiation protection devices are heavy and do not protect the head of the operator. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and comfort of caps and thyroid collars made of a disposable, light-weight, lead-free material (XPF) for occupational radiation protection in a clinical setting.SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Up to two interventional operators were randomized to wear a XPF or standard 0.5-mm lead-equivalent thyroid collars in 60 consecutive endovascu-lar procedures requiring fluoroscopy. Simultaneously a XPF cap was worn by all operators. Radiation doses were measured using dosimeters placed outside and underneath the caps and thyroid collars. Wearing comfort was assessed at the end of each procedure on a visual analog scale (0-100 [100 = optimal]).RESULTS. Patient and procedure data did not differ between the XPF and standard protection groups. The cumulative radiation dose measured outside the cap was 15,700 糞v and outside the thyroid collars 21,240 糞v. Measured radiation attenuation provided by the XPF caps (n = 70), XPF thyroid collars (n = 40), and standard thyroid collars (n = 38) was 85.4% ?25.6%, 79.7% ?25.8% and 71.9% ?34.2%, respectively (mean difference XPF vs standard thyroid collars, 7.8% [95% CI, -5.9% to 21.6%]; p = 0.258). The median XPF cap weight was 144 g (interquartile range, 128-170 g), and the XPF thyroid collars were 27% lighter than the standard thyroid collars (p < 0.0001). Operators rated the comfort of all devices as high (mean scores for XPF caps and XPF thyroid collars 83.4 ?12.7 (SD) and 88.5 ?14.6, respectively; mean scores for standard thyroid collars 89.6 ?9.9) (p = 0.648).CONCLUSION. Light-weight disposable caps and thyroid collars made of XPF were assessed as being comfortable to wear, and they provide radiation protection similar to that of standard 0.5-mm lead-equivalent thyroid collars.
机译:目的。干预人员的辐射暴露正在增加。当前可用的标准辐射防护设备很重,不能保护操作员的头部。这项研究的目的是评估由一次性,轻量,无铅材料(XPF)制成的帽子和甲状腺项圈在临床环境中的职业辐射防护的有效性和舒适性。对象和方法。多达60名连续的需要荧光检查的血管内手术中,随机将两名介入手术者随机穿XPF或标准的0.5mm铅当量甲状腺项圈。同时,所有操作员都佩戴了XPF帽。使用放置在帽和甲状腺项圈外部和下方的剂量计测量辐射剂量。在每个手术结束时,以视觉模拟量表(0-100 [100 =最佳])评估佩戴舒适度。结果。 XPF和标准保护组之间的患者和程序数据没有差异。帽外测量的累计辐射剂量为15700粪v,甲状腺项圈外的测量为21240粪v。 XPF帽(n = 70),XPF甲状腺项圈(n = 40)和标准甲状腺项圈(n = 38)提供的测得的辐射衰减分别为85.4%?25.6%,79.7%?25.8%和71.9%?34.2% ,分别(XPF与标准甲状腺项圈的平均差异为7.8%[95%CI,-5.9%至21.6%]; p = 0.258)。 XPF帽的中位重量为144 g(四分位间距为128-170 g),并且XPF甲状腺项圈比标准甲状腺项圈轻27%(p <0.0001)。操作人员将所有设备的舒适度评为高(XPF帽和XPF甲状腺项圈的平均分数分别为83.4±12.7(SD)和88.5±14.6;标准甲状腺项圈的平均分数为89.6±9.9)(p = 0.648)。经评估,由XPF制成的轻质一次性帽子和甲状腺项圈佩戴舒适,并且它们的辐射防护类似于标准的0.5毫米铅等效甲状腺项圈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号