首页> 外文期刊>AJOB neuroscience >Cognitive Psychological Support for the ADC Model of Moral Judgment
【24h】

Cognitive Psychological Support for the ADC Model of Moral Judgment

机译:ADC道德判断模型的认知心理支持。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

"It is important to provide a common theoretical framework that would link the neuroscience and cognitive science literature on decision making and moral judgment, and the ADC approach with the REACT model is a step in this direction" (Dubljevi? and Racine 2014, 15). Previously, cognitive psychologists researching rationality and decision making mostly utilized a dual-process framework (Evans 2008). However, recently this approach has been brought into question. Here we show how new theoretical frameworks in cognitive psychology can deliver support for the ADC model of moral intuitions proposed by Dubljevi? and Racine. The main goal of this commentary is thus to demonstrate that some tasks typically thought to involve reflective processes, such as evaluating the validity of a conclusion or incorporating base rates into posterior probability judgments, can also be accomplished intuitively. These findings from experimental cognitive psychology support key aspects of the ADC model.
机译:“重要的是提供一个通用的理论框架,将决策和道德判断方面的神经科学和认知科学文献联系起来,ADC方法与REACT模型是朝这个方向迈出的一步”(Dubljevi?和Racine 2014,第15页) 。以前,研究合理性和决策的认知心理学家大多采用双过程框架(Evans 2008)。但是,最近这种方法受到质疑。在这里,我们展示了认知心理学的新理论框架如何为Dubljevi提出的道德直觉的ADC模型提供支持?和拉辛。因此,此评论的主要目的是证明某些通常被认为涉及反思性过程的任务,例如评估结论的有效性或将基本比率纳入后验概率判断中,也可以直观地完成。来自实验认知心理学的这些发现支持ADC模型的关键方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号