首页> 外文期刊>AJOB neuroscience >Virtue essentialism, prototypes, and the moral conservative opposition to enhancement technologies: A neuroethical critique
【24h】

Virtue essentialism, prototypes, and the moral conservative opposition to enhancement technologies: A neuroethical critique

机译:美德本质主义,原型和对增强技术的道德保守主义反对:神经伦理学批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Moral conservatives such as the ones who served on George W. Bush's President's Councils on Bioethics are known to be cautious about if not categorically opposed to enhancement technologies. This article examines the argumentative styles of two of the best known of these scholars, Leon Kass and Michael Sandel, as gleaned from essays they authored while serving on Bush's councils. The goal of this essay is to evaluate their argumentative approach opposing enhancement, which I call "virtue essentialism." Using a critical perspective informed by prototype theory, I argue that the "virtue essentialist" approach of Kass and Sandel, despite its popularity among moral conservatives and the electorate, is remarkably underpowered. I conclude by arguing that despite my reservations, the likelihood of virtue essentialism retaining its popularity nevertheless seems very good indeed.
机译:众所周知,诸如在乔治·W·布什总统的生物伦理委员会中任职的道德保守主义者对于谨慎地反对增强技术持谨慎态度。本文考察了其中两位最著名的学者莱昂·卡斯(Leon Kass)和迈克尔·桑德尔(Michael Sandel)的论证风格,这些论调来自他们在布什议会任职期间撰写的论文。本文的目的是评估他们反对增强的辩论方法,我称之为“虚拟本质主义”。我使用原型理论的批判性观点认为,尽管Kass和Sandel的“虚拟本质主义者”方法在道德保守主义者和选民中很受欢迎,但其功能却明显不足。最后,我认为尽管有我的保留意见,美德本质主义保持其流行的可能性确实确实非常好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号