首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >A two-tiered approach to MRI for hearing loss: Incremental cost of a comprehensive MRI over high-resolution T2-weighted imaging
【24h】

A two-tiered approach to MRI for hearing loss: Incremental cost of a comprehensive MRI over high-resolution T2-weighted imaging

机译:听力损失的MRI的两层方法:全面的MRI相对于高分辨率T2加权成像的增量成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two approaches to using MRI for the evaluation of patients with hearing loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We developed a decision tree to compare the cost-effectiveness of conventional MRI with that of a proposed two-tiered model in which an initial 3D T2-weighted imaging examination was used to determine the need for comprehensive MR scanning. Three radiologists independently and blindly reviewed the 3D T2-weighted images acquired as part of the comprehensive MR examinations of 256 patients with hearing loss to assess the diagnostic efficacy of the two-tiered approach. Costs were defined in terms of both the scanner utilization time for the imaging facility and the dollar amount for payers. Effectiveness was defined in terms of the ability to correctly detect the presence or absence of disease. RESULTS. The conventional approach was less cost-effective, with a baseline incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 27,299 minutes of scanner utilization per unit increase in effectiveness. Assuming a 50% reduction in the reimbursement of the technical component from the current level by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, this result reflected an ICER of $258,664 per unit increase in effectiveness. The results of a sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the cost-effectiveness of the two-tiered imaging approach in a variety of scenarios that reflect differences in scanning practices and possible differences in recall rates. The conventional imaging approach was absolutely dominated by the two-tiered approach in the scenarios created to reflect the expected range of prevalence of disease. CONCLUSION. A two-tiered approach to MRI provides a more cost-effective alternative to the current approach of using a comprehensive MRI examination without and with contrast material to evaluate patients with hearing loss.
机译:目的。我们研究的目的是比较两种使用MRI评估听力损失患者的成本效益。材料和方法。我们开发了一个决策树,将传统MRI的成本效益与提议的两层模型的成本效益进行比较,在该模型中,使用初始3D T2加权成像检查来确定全面MR扫描的需求。三名放射科医生独立,盲目地查看了256例听力损失患者的MR综合检查中获得的3D T2加权图像,以评估两层方法的诊断效力。成本是根据成像设备的扫描仪使用时间和付款人的美元金额来定义的。根据正确检测疾病存在或不存在的能力来定义有效性。结果。常规方法的成本效益较差,每增加一单位的扫描仪利用率,基线增量成本效益比(ICER)为27,299分钟。假设医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将技术部分的报销额从当前水平减少了50%,则此结果反映出ICER效率每提高258,664美元。敏感性分析的结果表明,在反映扫描方式差异和召回率可能差异的各种情况下,两层成像方法成本效益的稳健性。在为反映疾病的预期患病范围而创建的场景中,常规成像方法绝对受两层方法的支配。结论。 MRI的两层方法提供了比目前使用综合MRI检查(不使用和使用对比材料来评估听力损失患者)的方法更具成本效益的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号