首页> 外文期刊>Hematology. >Comparative assessment of prophylactic transfusions of platelet concentrates obtained by the PRP or buffy-coat methods, in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
【24h】

Comparative assessment of prophylactic transfusions of platelet concentrates obtained by the PRP or buffy-coat methods, in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

机译:通过PRP或Buff-Coat方法获得的血小板浓缩物的预防输血对经,对经同种异体造血干细胞移植的患者获得的血小板浓缩物的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Whole blood-derived platelet concentrates can be obtained by the platelet-rich plasma (PRP-PCs) or the buffy-coat (BC-PCs) method. Few studies have shown that BC-PCs display lower in vitro platelet activation, but scarce information exists regarding transfusion efficacy. We have performed a retrospective study assessing platelet transfusion in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in our clinic, before and after the implementation of BC-PCs. Methods: We reviewed clinical records corresponding to 70 PRP-PCs and 86 BC-PCs prophylactic transfusions, which were performed to 55 AHCT patients. Transfusion efficacy was assessed by the 24-h post-transfusion corrected count increment (24-h CCI) and bleeding events. Clinical factors affecting transfusion outcome were also investigated. Results: Clinical characteristics and the total number of platelet transfusions were similar among groups. Mean donor exposure was 5.8 and 5.0 in each single PRP-PCs and BC-PCs transfusion, respectively (p 0.01). The 24-h CCI was significantly higher in patients transfused with BC-PCs than in those receiving PRP-PCs (8.3[2.7-13.4] vs. 4.7[1.3-8.1]; p 0.01). Independent predictors of poor platelet transfusion response included diagnosis other than acute leukemia (HR 8.30; 95% CI 1.96-35.22; p = 0.004), splenomegaly (HR 8.75; 95% CI 2.77-27.60; p 0.001), graft versus host disease prophylaxis different from cyclosporine A and methotrexate (HR 3.96; 95% CI 1.55-10.14; p = 0.004) and PRP-PCs transfusion (HR 4.54; 95% CI 1.72-12.01; p = 0.002). There were no differences between both groups regarding the bleeding events. Conclusion: In the AHCT setting, we hypothesize that BC-PCs transfusion, when compared to PRP-PCs, results in higher CCI and reduced donor exposure, but provides no significant benefit regarding bleeding outcome.
机译:目的:全血源性血小板浓缩物可通过富血小板的血浆(PRP-PC)或Buffy-Coat(BC-PC)方法获得。很少有研究表明,BC-PCS显示出较低的体外血小板激活,但存在关于输血效能的稀缺信息。我们已经进行了评估血小板输血的回顾性研究,该研究在我们的临床中进行了对同种异体造血细胞移植(AHCT)的患者,在实施BC-PC之前和之后。方法:我们审查了对应于70个PRP-PC和86个BC-PCS预防性输血的临床记录,该输血进行了55 AHCT患者。通过24-H后矫正计数增量(24-H CCI)和出血事件评估输血疗效。还研究了影响输血结果的临床因素。结果:临床特征和血小板输血总数在群中相似。在每个单一PRP-PC和BC-PCS输血中,平均供体暴露为5.8和5.0(P <0.01)。与BC-PC转染的患者的24-H CCI显着高于接受PRP-PC(8.3 [2.7-13.4]与4.7 [1.3-8.1]; P <0.01)。血小板输血响应不良的独立预测因子包括急性白血病以外的诊断(HR 8.30; 95%CI 1.96-35.22; P = 0.004),脾肿大(HR 8.75; 95%CI 2.77-27.60; P <0.001),移植与宿主疾病预防不同于环孢菌素A和甲氨蝶呤(HR 3.96; 95%CI 1.55-10.14; P = 0.004)和PRP-PCS输血(HR 4.54; 95%CI 1.72-12.01; P = 0.002)。对出血事件的两组之间没有差异。结论:在AHCT设置中,我们假设BC-PCS输血与PRP-PC相比,导致更高的CCI和减少的供体暴露,但对出血结果没有显着的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号