首页> 外文期刊>Headache >A Brief Look at Urgent Care Visits for Migraine: The Care Received and Ideas to Guide Migraine Care in this Proliferating Medical Setting
【24h】

A Brief Look at Urgent Care Visits for Migraine: The Care Received and Ideas to Guide Migraine Care in this Proliferating Medical Setting

机译:简要介绍偏头痛的紧急护理:在这种增殖医疗环境中指导偏头痛护理的护理和想法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective There has been a rise in urgent care centers throughout the country over the past 10?years, leading to an increase in patients accessing medical care in these locations. These centers advertise an alternative to the Emergency Department (ED) for the evaluation and treatment of urgent medical conditions. The goal of this analysis was to examine the use of urgent care visits for migraine within 2 urgent care centers within a large academic medical system in New York City. We examined the trends in management and treatment of migraine in these urgent care settings, as well as prescriptions and instructions given to this patient population upon discharge. We paid particular attention to whether the medications administered and prescribed on discharge were those recommended by American Headache Society migraine management guidelines. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with migraine diagnoses at 2 different urgent care locations within 1 large urban medical center. We determined baseline patient demographics, previous migraine characteristics, frequencies of reasons for urgent care visits as well as various medications administered, medications prescribed on discharge, and characteristics of patient outcomes post‐discharge. Results Of the 78 patients who visited urgent care with a migraine diagnosis, 20 (25.6%) had a known primary care provider within the urgent care centers' healthcare system. More than three‐fourths of all patients (78.2%) had a self‐reported history of either recurrent headache or migraine prior to the urgent care visit. Of those with a documented frequency of prior headaches, 94.1% (32/34) had episodic migraine and 79.4% (27/34) experienced at most 1‐2 headache days per month. Of those presenting to the urgent care during an episode of migraine, 12.3% (9/73) were given intravenous metoclopramide and none were given subcutaneous sumatriptan or intravenous prochlorperazine. Of those with reported nausea or vomiting with their migraine, 46.2% (18/39) received an anti‐emetic at the visit and 33.3% (13/39) were given an anti‐emetic prescription. Only 11.1% (6/54) of patients who did not have a record of previous triptan use were given a triptan prescription at the urgent care visit. Conclusions The majority of patients in our study who sought medical treatment for migraine in these 2 urgent care centers were not established patients within the urgent care centers' healthcare system. While 93.6% (73/78) of patients were experiencing current pain upon presentation to the urgent care centers, only 12.3% (9/73) received administration of the medications with the highest level of evidence by the American Headache Society (Level B) for acute migraine treatment in an ED. In addition, the majority of patients with a migraine history presenting to the urgent care setting were not given triptans or anti‐emetic prescriptions upon discharge from their urgent care visit. Having these migraine‐specific prescriptions may improve self‐treatment at home should a migraine attack recur.
机译:目的在过去的10年里,全国各地的紧急护理中心升高了,导致在这些地区访问医疗保健的患者增加。这些中心向急诊部门(ED)提供替代,以获得迫切性病的评估和治疗。该分析的目标是审查在纽约市大型学术医疗系统内的2个紧急护理中心内使用紧急护理访问。我们检查了这些紧急护理环境中偏头痛的管理和治疗趋势,以及在出院时给予该患者人口的处方和指示。我们特别注意在美国头痛社会偏头痛管理指南推荐的那些所犯下的药物和规定的药物。方法我们对偏头痛患者进行了回顾性图表审查,在1个大城市医疗中心的2个不同的紧急护理地点诊断。我们确定基线患者人口统计学,以前的偏头痛特征,急诊考虑的原因以及施用的各种药物,排出后规定的药物,以及放电后患者结果的特征。 78名患者急诊护理患者的78名患者,20(25.6%)在紧急护理中心的医疗保健系统中有一个已知的初级护理提供者。在紧急护理访问之前,所有患者的四分之三(78.2%)患有自我报告的头痛或偏头痛的历史。在具有先前头痛的记录频率的那些中,94.1%(32/34)具有巨大的偏头痛,79.4%(27/34)至每月最多1-2天头疼。在术语中施加迫切护理的那些,静脉注射丙氨酸酮丙氨酸12.3%(9/73),没有被赋予皮下血管缩合或静脉注射普罗丙嗪。在那些报告的恶心或呕吐的人中,46.2%(18/39)在访问时接受抗催吐液,33.3%(13/39)被赋予抗催吐药。在紧急护理访问中,仅给予了未在使用以前的曲坦使用记录的11.1%(6/54)患者。结论我们研究的大多数患者在这两个紧急护理中心寻求偏头痛的医疗治疗,并未在紧急护理中心的医疗保健系统内建立患者。虽然93.6%(73/78)患者在介绍急诊中心时经历了当前的疼痛,但只有12.3%(9/73)接受了美国头痛社会的最高级别的药物治疗药物(b)用于ED中的急性偏头痛治疗。此外,大多数患有偏头痛历史的患者呈现给紧急护理环境的历史上没有给予曲坦斯或抗慢性处方,从他们的紧急护理访问中排出。具有这些偏头痛的处方可以改善家庭的自我治疗,如果偏头痛攻击反复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号