首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants >A Comparison of Esthetic Features of Pre-existing Natural Tooth Versus Post-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective 12-month Follow-up
【24h】

A Comparison of Esthetic Features of Pre-existing Natural Tooth Versus Post-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone: A Retrospective 12-month Follow-up

机译:美学特征对美学区预先存在的自然牙齿与植入后恢复的比较:回顾性为12个月的随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To correlate the link between natural teeth located in esthetic regions of the arches before extraction with their definitive dental implant restorations, and to propose a new and contemporary esthetic index based on the natural dentition (EIND) preoperatively. Materials and Methods: Patients possessing a high smile line with teeth requiring implant replacement therapy in the maxillary anterior region were included. Clinical intraoral photographs and periapical digital radiographs taken before extraction and 10 +/- 1.5 months (range: 9 to 12 months) after the delivery of implant-supported permanent restorations were used to make the measurements and evaluations according to the proposed index. Pink esthetic score (PES) parameters were analyzed. Statistical analyses of preimplant and postimplant parameters between tooth sites and implant sites were carried out with a computer software program. Results: The study included 51 patients (35 women, 16 men), with a mean age of 39.6 years, with a total of 83 dental implants placed in the maxillary anterior region. Of these, there were 6 right canines, 22 right lateral incisors, 11 right central incisors, 22 left central incisors, 17 left lateral incisors, and 5 left canines. Of the 83 included implants, 67 were immediately and 16 were delayed placed. Statistical analyses between tooth sites and implant sites showed significant differences in tissue contour (P = .001), texture (P = .001), alveolar deficiency (P = .001), and total PES (P = .007). No statistically significant difference was detected in mesial papilla, distal papilla, tissue margin, tissue biotype, and the amount of keratinized mucosa. Additionally, R2 value presented a higher variance and lower predictable values of pert-implant tissue parameters compared with those of the natural dentition. Conclusion: This study analyzed various periodontal and pert-implant soft and hard tissue parameters, and a new index system, EIND, was proposed. This index could be used to collect the esthetic-related parameters for pre-extraction treatment planning and provide valuable information for esthetic risk assessment.
机译:目的:将位于拱门射出区域的天然牙齿之间的链接与其明确的牙科植入物修复,并术前基于自然牙列(Eind)提出新的和当代美学指数。包括材料和方法:包括患有需要在上颌前部区域需要植入物置换疗法的牙齿的高笑脸的患者。临床内部照片和临床数字射线照片在提取和10 +/-1.5个月(范围:9至12个月),植入物支持的永久修复后用于根据所提出的指数进行测量和评估。分析了粉红色美学评分(PES)参数。用计算机软件程序执行牙齿站点和植入部位之间的预处理和后植物参数的统计分析。结果:该研究包括51名患者(35名女性,16名男性),平均年龄为39.6岁,共有83名牙科植入物放置在上颌前部区域。其中,有6种右侧犬,22例右侧牙齿,11种右侧切口,22例,左侧切口,17例左侧切口,5个左侧诱饵。在83个包含的植入物中,67次立即延迟16次。牙齿部位和植入部位之间的统计分析显示出组织轮廓的显着差异(p = .001),纹理(p = .001),肺泡缺损(p = .001)和全PES(p = .007)。在薄膜乳头,远端乳头,组织边缘,组织生物型和角质化粘膜的量中没有检测到统计学上显着的差异。另外,与天然牙列的那些,R2值呈现更高的差异和较低的Pert-incormant组织参数值。结论:本研究分析了各种牙周和植物植入物软和硬组织参数,并提出了一种新的指标体系,eind。该指数可用于收集相关的相关参数以进行预提取治疗计划,并为美学风险评估提供有价值的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号