首页> 外文期刊>Visual Communication >Which way did he go? Film lateral movement and spectator interpretation
【24h】

Which way did he go? Film lateral movement and spectator interpretation

机译:他走了哪种方式? 薄膜横向运动和观众解释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Elements of on-screen motion in film hold specific meanings and contexts depending on their usage in the moving image. The common wisdom that left-to-right is primary, preferred, and evaluated as more positive has not been directly tested with spectator responses. This study focuses on how film spectators interpret lateral motion, comparing left-to-right and right-to-left. A posttest only experimental design utilized footage from a short film as the stimulus. Participants completed a questionnaire after watching the sequence, answering items concerning affective and perceptual evaluations of the sequence. ANOVAs showed a significant difference between the experimental groups on the Positive Affect spectator evaluation scale and the Activity scale, such that right-to-left motion was perceived more negatively and as less active. There were no differences in the Uniqueness scale. Additionally, the study found no support for potential moderating impacts of religion or psychometric characteristics, indicating robustness of the main findings.
机译:屏幕上的屏幕运动的元素根据其在运动图像中的使用情况持有特定含义和上下文。左右是初级,首选和评估的共同智慧,并尚未直接用观众响应直接测试。本研究重点介绍了电影观众如何解释横向运动,从左到右和左右比较。仅限后测试仅使用短膜的实验设计作为刺激的镜头。参与者在观看序列后完成了调查问卷,回答有关序列的情感和感知评估的项目。 Anovas在正面影响观众评估规模和活动量表之间的实验组之间显示出显着差异,使得左右运动更加负,并且具有较少的活性。唯一性规模没有差异。此外,该研究发现,没有支持宗教或心理测量特征的潜在调节影响,表明主要结果的稳健性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号