首页> 外文期刊>AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology >Back to the tower of Babel: Comparing outcomes from aneurysm trials
【24h】

Back to the tower of Babel: Comparing outcomes from aneurysm trials

机译:回到巴别塔楼:比较动脉瘤试验的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most therapies within the field of interventional neuroradiology have a lack of robust evidence. While several schemas describing the various tiers of "evidence" exist, most reserve the term "level 1 evidence" for that obtained in the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Some scales reserve level 1 for therapies vetted in multiple RCTs and then subjected to formal meta-analysis.
机译:介入神经放射学领域内的大多数疗法都缺乏可靠的证据。尽管存在描述“证据”各个层次的几种模式,但大多数模式保留了“ 1级证据”这一术语,表示在随机对照试验(RCT)中获得的证据。一些量表将级别1保留为在多个RCT中经过审核的治疗方法,然后进行正式的荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号