首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-Effectiveness of a Technology-Facilitated Depression Care Management Adoption Model in Safety-Net Primary Care Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness of a Technology-Facilitated Depression Care Management Adoption Model in Safety-Net Primary Care Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

机译:技术促进抑郁保健管理采用模型在2型糖尿病患者中的技术促进抑郁护理管理采用模型的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundThe Diabetes-Depression Care-Management Adoption Trial is a translational study of safety-net primary care predominantly Hispanic/Latino patients with type 2 diabetes in collaboration with the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. ObjectivesTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an information and communication technology (ICT)-facilitated depression care management program. MethodsCost-effectiveness of the ICT-facilitated care (TC) delivery model was evaluated relative to a usual care (UC) and a supported care (SC) model. TC added automated low-intensity periodic depression assessment calls to patients. Patient-reported outcomes included the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey converted into quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire–calculated depression-free days (DFDs). Costs and outcomes data were collected over a 24-month period (?6 to 0 months baseline, 0 to 18 months study intervention). ResultsA sample of 1406 patients (484 in UC, 480 in SC, and 442 in TC) was enrolled in the nonrandomized trial. TC had a significant improvement in DFDs (17.3;P= 0.011) and significantly greater 12-Item Short Form Health Survey utility improvement (2.1%;P= 0.031) compared with UC. Medical costs were statistically significantly lower for TC (?$2328;P= 0.001) relative to UC but not significantly lower than for SC. TC had more than a 50% probability of being cost-effective relative to SC at willingness-to-pay thresholds of more than $50,000/QALY. ConclusionsAn ICT-facilitated depression care (TC) delivery model improved QALYs, DFDs, and medical costs. It was cost-effective compared with SC and dominant compared with UC.
机译:背景技术糖尿病抑郁护理管理采用试验是对安全净初级保健的翻译研究,主要是西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者2型糖尿病患者,与洛杉矶县卫生服务部合作。 Objectivesto评估信息和通信技术(ICT)的成本效益 - 挑选的抑郁护理管理计划。相对于通常的护理(UC)和支持的护理(SC)模型评估了ICT促进护理(TC)输送模型的方法的方法。 TC为患者添加了自动低强度定期抑郁症评估呼叫。患者报告的结果包括12项短型健康调查转化为质量调整的生命年龄(QALYS)和9项患者健康问卷调查抑郁症 - 无抑郁天(DFD)。在24个月内收集成本和结果数据(?6至0个月基线,0至18个月的研究干预)。在非扫描试验中注册了1406名患者的1406名患者的样品(484例,480例,480中,480例,482例)。 TC对DFD(17.3; P = 0.011)进行了显着改善,与UC相比,12项短型健康调查实用能力提高(2.1%; P = 0.031)。对于UC的TC(2328美元; P = 0.001),医疗费用统计学显着降低,但不会显着低于SC。在愿意支付超过50,000美元/ QALY的意愿阈值,TC相对于支付阈值超过50%的概率。结论Ansan ICT促进的抑郁护理(TC)交付模式改善了Qalys,DFD和医疗费用。与UC相比,它与SC和主导相比具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号