...
首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Influences on lateral passing distance when motor vehicles overtake bicycles: a systematic literature review
【24h】

Influences on lateral passing distance when motor vehicles overtake bicycles: a systematic literature review

机译:机动车辆超越自行车时的横向距离的影响:系统文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cyclists are often passed by motor vehicles in low-cycling countries where most riding occurs on roads. When passing events occur, the lateral passing distance (LPD) between motor vehicles and bicycles is critically important for objective and subjective safety. This systematic review identified 42 papers reporting 36 independent studies of LPD. Seven papers reported sufficient information to be included in meta-analyses for four different variables; road width, speed limit, on-road bicycle lanes compared to no bicycle lanes and bus versus car. The meta-analyses showed significant positive relationships between LPD and road width, and between LPD and speed limit; and smaller LPDs when cyclists were passed by buses rather than cars. The effect of on-road bicycle infrastructure was inconsistent. Studies that considered cyclist factors such as gender or type of cyclist showed mixed results. Seven out of eight studies found that the closer the cyclist rode to the kerb, the larger the LPD. Lastly, the passing strategy chosen by drivers (accelerative or flying) also showed mixed results. The results of the review are consistent with the predictions of the Multiple Comfort Zone model which predicts that the distance a driver leaves between their vehicle and other road users will be based on attempting to maintain their own comfort zone. Other motor vehicles pose a greater risk to drivers than bicycles, therefore the distance a driver chooses between their vehicle and a bicycle may be compromised if there are other vehicles present or if the available travel space is restricted. As governments around the world grapple with increasing health costs caused by physical inactivity, bicycle riding is being encouraged. Given the importance of the passing manoeuvre for cyclist safety, when designing infrastructure to foster cycling, factors that influence LPD should be considered.
机译:骑自行车的人经常被骑车车在低骑行国家通过,大多数骑行都在道路上发生。发生在发生事件时,机动车辆和自行车之间的横向通过距离(LPD)对于客观和主观安全性至关重要。该系统审查确定了42篇论文报告36对LPD的独立研究。七篇论文报告了足够的信息,以便包含在四种不同变量的Meta分析中;道路宽,限速,路上自行车车道与无自行车道和公交车与汽车相比。 Meta分析显示LPD和道路宽度与LPD和速度限制之间的显着正相关关系;当骑自行车者通过公共汽车而不是汽车时,较小的LPD。路上自行车基础设施的效果不一致。考虑骑车者因素,如性别或骑自行车者类型的研究表明了混合结果。八项研究中的七项发现发现骑自行车者骑行到路缘,LPD越大。最后,司机(加速或飞行)选择的通过策略也显示出混合结果。审查结果与多个舒适区模型的预测一致,这预测其车辆与其他道路用户之间的距离驾驶员的距离将基于试图维护自己的舒适区。其他机动车辆对驾驶员的风险造成更大的风险,而不是自行车,因此如果存在其他车辆或者可用的旅行空间受到限制,则驾驶员在其车辆和自行车之间选择的距离可能会受到损害。随着世界各地的政府努力增加由于身体不活动造成的健康成本,正在鼓励自行车骑行。鉴于传递机动对骑自行车的安全性的重要性,在设计基础设施以促进骑自行车时,应考虑影响LPD的因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transport Reviews》 |2020年第6期|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Queensland Univ Technol Inst Hlth &

    Biomed Innovat IHBI Ctr Accid Res &

    Rd Safety CARRS Q 130 Victoria Pk Rd Brisbane Qld 4059 Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol Inst Hlth &

    Biomed Innovat IHBI Ctr Accid Res &

    Rd Safety CARRS Q 130 Victoria Pk Rd Brisbane Qld 4059 Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol Inst Hlth &

    Biomed Innovat IHBI Ctr Accid Res &

    Rd Safety CARRS Q 130 Victoria Pk Rd Brisbane Qld 4059 Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol QUT Inst Hlth &

    Biomed Innovat IHBI Sch Psychol &

    Counselling Brisbane Qld Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 综合运输;
  • 关键词

    Comfort zones; cyclist safety; lateral passing distance; minimum passing distance; overtaking;

    机译:舒适区;骑自行车的安全;横向通过距离;最小通过距离;超车;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号