...
首页> 外文期刊>Transplant immunology >Donor-specific HLA antibodies in predicting crossmatch outcome: Comparison of three different laboratory techniques
【24h】

Donor-specific HLA antibodies in predicting crossmatch outcome: Comparison of three different laboratory techniques

机译:供体特异性HLA抗体预测交叉迁移结果:三种不同的实验室技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The virtual crossmatch, which is based on single antigen bead technology, is used in the prediction of crossmatch results. However, this assay differs in sensitivity and specificity from crossmatch methods. In our study, the results of physical crossmatches, performed with three different methods, were assessed against virtual cross-match results. The aim was to determine the potential cut-off values for donor specific antibodies (DSA) that would predict the crossmatch results obtained by different methods. The results of different crossmatch techniques were correlated with the virtual crossmatch. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed the Flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) and Luminex crossmatch (LXM) to be the most accurate, with area under curve (AUC) values of 0.861 and 0.805, respectively. While we found that the virtual crossmatch correlated well with all the crossmatch results, FCXM produced the best results (83% of the DSA detected). LXM outperformed the other tests in terms of the accuracy in separating class II DSA.
机译:基于单抗原珠技术的虚拟交叉迁移用于预测交叉匹配结果。然而,该测定与横向方法的敏感性和特异性不同。在我们的研究中,用三种不同方法进行物理交叉迁移的结果,用于针对虚拟交叉匹配结果进行评估。目的是确定供体特异性抗体(DSA)的潜在截止值,该抗体(DSA)预测通过不同方法获得的交叉段结果。不同交叉匹配技术的结果与虚拟交叉匹配相关。接收器操作特征(ROC)分析显示流式细胞术交叉迁移(FCXM)和Luminex交叉迁移(LXM)是最准确的,分别在曲线(AUC)值下的面积分别为0.861和0.805。虽然我们发现虚拟交叉迁移与所有交叉磁共振结果都很好,但FCXM产生了最佳结果(检测到DSA的83%)。 LXM在分离II类DSA的准确性方面表现出其他测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号