首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology >Controversies in Maxillofacial Trauma
【24h】

Controversies in Maxillofacial Trauma

机译:颌面外伤的争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Craniomaxillofacial trauma management has continued to improve and evolve as a result of advances in technology and scientific inquiry. Controversies exist where there is little evidence-based literature to guide treatment in frontal sinus management, rigid versus absorbable fixation, open versus closed treatment of mandibular condyle fractures, extraction of teeth in the line of fracture, optimal timing for repair of mandible fractures, antibiotic use for facial wounds and fractures, and reconstructive materials in orbital fracture reconstruction. This article reviews current literature to resolve some of the controversies, and to improve patient care by reducing variability and uncertainty in the optimal management of patients with facial trauma.
机译:由于技术和科学探究的进步,颅骨毛细血管创伤计划继续提高和发展。 存在争议的基于循题鼻窦管理中的循证文献,刚性与可吸收固定,开放与闭合性髁突骨骨折,牙齿萃取牙齿的提取,最佳的颌骨骨折修复时机,抗生素 用于面部伤口和骨折,以及轨道骨折重建中的重建材料。 本文审查了当前文献来解决一些争议,并通过降低面部创伤患者的最佳管理中的可变性和不确定性来改善患者护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号