首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >The Price Effects of Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers
【24h】

The Price Effects of Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers

机译:现金与实物转移的价格影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the effect of cash versus in-kind transfers on local prices. Both types of transfers increase the demand for normal goods; in-kind transfers also increase supply in recipient communities, which could lead to lower prices than under cash transfers. We test and confirm this prediction using a programme in Mexico that randomly assigned villages to receive boxes of food (trucked into the village), equivalently-valued cash transfers, or no transfers. We find that prices are significantly lower under in-kind transfers compared to cash transfers; relative to the control group, in-kind transfers cause a 4% fall in prices while cash transfers cause a positive but negligible increase in prices. In the more economically developed villages in the sample, households purchasing power is only modestly affected by these price effects. In the less developed villages, the price effects are much larger in magnitude, which we show is due to these villages being less tied to the outside economy and having less competition among local suppliers.
机译:本文介绍了现金与实物转让对当地价格的影响。两种类型的转移都会增加对普通品的需求;实物转账也增加了受援社区的供应,这可能导致价格低于现金转移。我们使用墨西哥的计划测试并确认这一预测,随机分配了村庄以接收食物盒(卡车进入村庄),等效的现金转移,或者没有转移。与现金转移相比,我们发现价格在实物转移下的价格明显降低;相对于对照组,实物转移导致价格下跌4%,而现金转移则导致价格上涨但可忽略的价格。在样品中更经济地发达的村庄中,家庭代购能力仅受到这些价格影响的谦虚影响。在较不发达的村庄中,价格效应的幅度要大得多,我们展示的是由于这些村庄不太依赖于外界经济,并在当地供应商之间竞争较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号