首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Private Governance and the three biases of political philosophy
【24h】

Private Governance and the three biases of political philosophy

机译:<重点类型=“斜体”>私人治理以及政治哲学的三个偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Private Governance shows that philosophers, political and legal theorists, and social scientists mistakenly believe in legal centralism, the view that order in the world depends upon and is made possible by state law. In fact, most governance not only happens to be private, but must be private. This paper extends Edward Stringham’s argument by claiming that philosophers tend to suffer from three biases. Diffidence bias means they are overly pessimistic about people’s willingness and ability to cooperate without state enforcement. Statism bias means the overestimate the degree to which cooperation is secured by the state. Guarantee bias means they overestimate the value and need for legal guarantees.
机译:私人治理表明,哲学家,政治和法律理论家和社会科学家们错误地相信法律中央,认为世界的命令取决于国家法律。 事实上,大多数治理不仅恰当是私人的,而且必须是私人的。 本文通过声称哲学家倾向于遭受三个偏见,延伸了爱德华斯特朗彻姆的论点。 偏差意味着他们对人们的意愿和没有国家执法的合作能力过于悲观。 统计偏见意味着高估了国家通过国家保护的程度。 保证偏见意味着他们高估价值并需要法律担保。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号