首页> 外文期刊>The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care >Unreliable Survey Doesn’t Sink Mucinex Fast-Max’All In One’Claim In NAD Review
【24h】

Unreliable Survey Doesn’t Sink Mucinex Fast-Max’All In One’Claim In NAD Review

机译:在NAD评论中,不可靠的调查不再陷入粘糊糊的FAST-MAXALL

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC and Procter & Gamble Co.’s third industry self-regulation bout in three years ended in a draw as some RB ad claims for Mucinex Fast-Max Cold,Flu & Sore Throat withstood a review while others were knocked out on a P&G challenge.RB didn’t get help in its corner from a consumer perception survey it submitted to support its argument that the”All In One”statement on labeling is not a claim that the product treats all cold and flu symptoms.However,while the Council of Better Business Bureaus’National Advertising Division dismissed the survey as faulty,it scored the round for RB’s argument anyway.
机译:Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC和Procter&Gamble Co.的第三个行业自我监管在三年内终止了一款遗址,因为一些RB广告对杀螨剂的索赔Fast-Max寒冷,流感及疼痛的喉咙有所作为,而其他人被淘汰出局 一个p&g挑战.rb从消费者的感知调查中没有得到帮助,它提交了它的论点,即关于标签的“一体化”声明不是一个索赔,即产品对所有感冒和流感症状症状。但是, 虽然更好的商业局局的局局的理事会将调查视为错误,但无论如何,它对RB的论点进行了速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号