CIR Panel Not Changing Its Mind About Parabens Safety, Renewing NGO Accusations Of Bias

Lauren Nardella

首页> 外文期刊>The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care >CIR Panel Not Changing Its Mind About Parabens Safety, Renewing NGO Accusations Of Bias

【24h】

CIR Panel Not Changing Its Mind About Parabens Safety, Renewing NGO Accusations Of Bias

机译：CIR盘区不会改变其关于帕拉布伦安全的思想，更新非政府组织的指责

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

团队文献服务 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Halfway through the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel’s September 24-25 meeting, Women’s Voices for the Earth was already blogging that the panel seemed set on declaring parabens safe (which it went on to do on a tentative basis) despite what the NGO sees as increasing evidence to the contrary. Panelist statements from previous meetings suggest a pro-industry agenda, WVE suggests.

机译：中途通过化妆品成分审查专家小组的9月24日25日会议，妇女的地球声音已经博客已经博客，尽管非政府组织视为不断增加证据相反。来自之前的会议的小组成员陈述提出了一个Pro-Industy议程，WVE表明。

著录项

来源
《The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care 》 |2018年第40期| 共3页
作者
Lauren Nardella;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类香料及化妆品工业 ;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. CIR Panel Not Changing Its Mind About Parabens Safety, Renewing NGO Accusations Of Bias [J] . Lauren Nardella The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care . 2018 ,第40期

机译：CIR盘区不会改变其关于帕拉布伦安全的思想，更新非政府组织的指责
2. CIR Expert Panel Proposes Parabens Use Restriction, Still Confident In Safety Overall [J] . EILEEN FRANCIS The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care . 2019 ,第25期

机译：CIR专家小组提出了羟基苯甲酸酯的使用限制，整体安全仍然有信心
3. CIR Recalculates Parabens Safety Margins; Will Expert Panel’s Confidence Be Shaken? [J] . Ryan Nelson The Rose Sheet: Toiletries, Fragrances and Skin Care . 2018 ,第37期

机译：CIR重新计算羟基苯甲酸酯的安全边距; 专家组会摇摇欲坠吗？
4. Promoting Safety Culture: Change in Mindset [C] . Sharmose Yaqoob, Salman Khan Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition Conference . 2019

机译：促进安全文化：思维变化
5. Does influenza vaccination status change physician ordering patterns for respiratory viral panels? Inspection for selection bias [O] . G.K. Balasubramani, Sean Saul, Mary Patricia Nowalk, 2019

机译：流感疫苗的接种状况是否会改变医生对呼吸道病毒板的订购方式？检查选择偏向
6. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines) 11The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.22This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Board of Trustees in July 2002 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in June 2002. When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Gibbons RJ, Balady GJ, Bricker JT, Chaitman BR, Fletcher GF, Froelicher VF, Mark DB, McCallister BD, Mooss AN, O’Reilly MG, Winters WL Jr. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.33Copies: This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the ACC (www.acc.org) and the AHA (www.americanheart.org). A single copy of the complete guidelines is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Resource Center, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. Ask for reprint No. 71-0231. To obtain a copy of the Executive Summary published in the October 1, 2002 issue of Circulation, ask for reprint No. 71-0232. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 410-528-4426, fax 410-528-4264, or e-mail kbradle@lww.com.44(J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1531–40.)55©2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Gibbons Raymond J, Balady Gary J, Timothy Bricker J, 2002

机译：ACC / AHA 2002年运动测试指南更新：摘要文章美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会对1997年运动测试指南进行了更新）11ACC / AHA实践指南工作组使每一个努力避免由于写作小组成员的外部关系或个人利益而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。具体来说，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组进行审查，在第一次会议上向书面小组的所有成员口头报告，并在发生变化时进行更新。22本文件于2002年7月获得美国心脏病学会基金会理事会的批准。美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会于2002年6月提出。引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会基金会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Gibbons RJ，Balady GJ，Bricker JT，Chaitman BR，Fletcher GF， Froelicher VF，Mark DB，McCalister BD，Mooss AN，O'Reilly MG，Winters WL Jr.ACC / AHA 2002锻炼测试指南更新：摘要文章：ACC / AHA实践指南工作组的报告（更新委员会）（1997年运动测试指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2002； 40：1531–40.33副本：该文档可在ACC（www.acc.org）和AHA（www.americanheart.org）的万维网站点上找到。可以通过致电800-253-4636（仅限美国）或写信给美国心脏病学会资源中心（位于贝塞斯达，乔治市老街9111号，马里兰州20814-1699）来获得完整指南的单个副本。要求转载第71-0231号。要获得发表在2002年10月1日的《发行》上的《执行摘要》，请索阅第71-0232号。要购买其他重印本（指定版本和重印本号码）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；否则，请重新发送。 1000份或更多，请致电410-528-4426，传真410-528-4264或电子邮件kbradle@lww.com.44（美国运筹学杂志，2002； 40：1531–40。）55©2002心脏病学基金会基金会和美国心脏协会有限公司
7. Boiling eXperiment Facility (BXF) Fluid Toxicity Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM) with the Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP). [R] . Sheredy, W. A. 2012

机译：使用有效负载安全审查小组（psRp）的沸腾实验设施（BXF）流体毒性技术交换会议（TIm）。

CIR Panel Not Changing Its Mind About Parabens Safety, Renewing NGO Accusations Of Bias

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅