首页> 外文期刊>The patient >Deliberative Engagement Methods for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
【24h】

Deliberative Engagement Methods for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

机译:患者以患者为中心的成果研究的审议参与方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is growing emphasis on eliciting and incorporating stakeholder perspectives into health research and public policy development. The deliberative engagement session (DES) method provides one approach to elicit informed preferences from patients and other stakeholders on policy issues. DES involves day-long interaction with participants, including short plenary presentations followed by small group discussion. While interest in DES methods is expanding, practical guidance for researchers on this method remains limited. In this paper, we describe the DES method and its contemporary relevance for health policy research, illustrate how to conduct a DES using an example of a recent patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) study with which we were involved, and discuss strengths and challenges of using this approach. DES methods generate rich data, reduce the risk of eliciting uniformed preferences or non-attitudes, and increase the likelihood of eliciting informed, reflective preferences. However, they are resource-intensive, and thus generally require trading away a larger, more representative sample. Despite these limitations, the DES method, when carefully designed, is well-suited for engaging stakeholders in research on complex health policy issues.
机译:越来越重视诱因和将利益相关者的观点纳入健康研究和公共政策发展。审议参与会议(DES)方法提供了一种在政策问题上引出患者和其他利益攸关方的知情偏好的方法。 DES涉及与参与者的一日互动,包括短全体会议,然后进行小组讨论。虽然对DES方法的兴趣正在扩大,但这种方法的研究人员的实际指导仍然有限。在本文中,我们描述了对健康政策研究的DES方法及其当代相关性,说明了如何使用我们所涉及的最近患者以患者为中心的结果研究(PCOR)研究的一个例子进行DES,并讨论优势和挑战使用这种方法。 DES方法产生丰富的数据,降低引起均匀偏好或非态度的风险,并增加引发知情,反思偏好的可能性。但是,它们是资源密集型的,因此通常需要交易更大,更具代表性的样本。尽管有这些限制,但在精心设计时,DES方法非常适合在复杂的健康政策问题上吸引利益相关者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号