...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Dental Association >Periodontal health during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances
【24h】

Periodontal health during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances

机译:牙周健康在正畸治疗过程中,用透明对准器和固定设备

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BackgroundClear aligners have become increasingly popular because of their esthetics and comfort. The authors’ aim in this systematic review was to compare periodontal health in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with clear aligners with that of those undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Types of Studies ReviewedThe authors systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to collect related studies. After extracting data and assessing quality, the authors performed a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to assess the quality of the evidence. ResultsThe authors included 9 studies in the quantitative synthesis analysis. Clear aligners were better for periodontal health, including plaque index (mean difference [MD],??0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI],??0.85 to??0.20;P?= .001), gingival index (MD,??0.27; 95% CI,??0.37 to??0.17;P< .001), and probing depth (MD,??0.35; 95% CI,??0.67 to??0.03;P?= .03), than were fixed appliances. However, the trial sequential analysis outcome indicated a false-positive meta-analysis result for probing depth. The authors downgraded the level of the evidence because of the risk of bias and inconsistency. Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsClear aligners were better for periodontal health than fixed appliances and might be recommended for patients at high risk of developing gingivitis. However, high-quality studies still are required.
机译:由于他们的美学和舒适,背景变压器变得越来越受欢迎。作者的目的在这种系统审查中是为了比较经历正畸治疗的患者的牙周健康,透明对准器具有与固定设备进行正畸治疗的那些。作者系统地搜索了作者的研究类型,系统地搜索了PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和研讨会数据库以收集相关研究。提取数据并评估质量后,作者进行了荟萃分析和试验顺序分析。作者使用了建议评估,开发和评估系统的评分来评估证据的质量。结果包括在定量合成分析中包括9项研究。透明对准器对于牙周健康更好,包括斑块指数(平均差异[MD],?? 0.53; 95%置信区间[CI],?? 0.85至约0.20; p?= .001),牙龈指数(MD, ?? 0.27; 95%CI,?? 0.37至约0.17; p <.001)和探测深度(MD,?? 0.35; 95%CI,?? 0.67至0.03; p?= .03)而不是固定设备。然而,试验顺序分析结果表明探测深度的假阳性荟萃分析结果。作者降级了证据水平,因为偏见的风险和不一致。结论和实际的含压对准器比固定电器更好地呈现出牙周健康,并且可能推荐用于开发牙龈炎的高风险的患者。但是,仍然需要高质量的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号