首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >The “G-Spot” Is Not a Structure Evident on Macroscopic Anatomic Dissection of the Vaginal Wall
【24h】

The “G-Spot” Is Not a Structure Evident on Macroscopic Anatomic Dissection of the Vaginal Wall

机译:“G-Spot”不是阴道壁的宏观解剖解剖的结构明显

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Background Controversy exists in the literature regarding the presence or absence of an anatomic “G-spot.” However, few studies have examined the detailed topographic or histologic anatomy of the putative G-spot location. Aim To determine the anatomy of the anterior vaginal wall and present detailed, systematic, accessible findings from female cadaveric dissections to provide anatomic clarity with respect to this location. Methods Systematic anatomic dissections were performed on 13 female cadavers (32–97 years old, 8 fixed and 5 fresh) to characterize the gross anatomy of the anterior vaginal wall. Digital photography was used to document dissections. Dissection preserved the anterior vaginal wall, urethra, and clitoris. In 9 cadavers, the vaginal epithelial layer was reflected to expose the underlying urethral wall and associated tissues. In 4 cadavers, the vaginal wall was left intact before preservation. Once photographed, 8 specimens were transversely sectioned for macroscopic inspection and histologic examination. Outcomes The presence or absence of a macroscopic anatomic structure at detailed cadaveric pelvis dissection that corresponds to the previously described G-spot and gross anatomic description of the anterior vaginal wall. Results Deep to the lining epithelium of the anterior vaginal wall is the urethra. There is no macroscopic structure other than the urethra and vaginal wall lining in the location of the putative G-spot. Specifically, there is no apparent erectile or “spongy” tissue in the anterior vaginal wall, except where the urethra abuts the clitoris distally. Clinical Implications The absence of an anatomic structure corresponding to the putative G-spot helps clarify the controversy on this subject. Strengths and Limitations Limitations to this study include limited access to specimens immediately after death and potential for observational bias. In addition, age, medical history, and cause of death are not publishable for privacy reasons. However, it is one of the most thorough and complete anatomic evaluations documenting the anatomic detail of the anterior vaginal wall. Conclusion The G-spot, in its current description, is not identified as a discrete anatomic entity at macroscopic dissection of the urethra or vaginal wall. Further insights could be provided by histologic study. Hoag N, Keast JR, O'Connell HE. The “G-Spot” Is Not a Structure Evident on Macroscopic Anatomic Dissection of the Vaginal Wall. J Sex Med 2017;14:1524–1532.
机译:抽象背景争议存在于有关解剖学“G点”的存在或不存在的文献中存在的。然而,很少有研究检测了推定的G斑位置的详细地形或组织学解剖学。目的是确定前阴道壁的解剖结构,并从雌性尸体扫描截止术中存在细致,系统,可接近的发现,以提供关于该位置的解剖学清晰度。方法对13名雌性尸体进行系统解剖剖检(32-97岁,8固定,5个新鲜)进行,以表征前阴道壁的总解剖结构。数码摄影用于记录解剖。解剖保留了前阴道壁,尿道和阴蒂。在9个尸体中,反映了阴道上皮层以暴露下面的尿道壁和相关组织。在4个尸体中,阴道壁在保存之前保持完整。拍摄后,横向切断8个标本,用于宏观检查和组织学检查。结果在详细的尸体骨盆剖检中结果或不存在宏观解剖结构,其对应于前面描述的前阴道壁的斑点和总解剖学描述。结果深入阴道阴道壁的衬里上皮是尿道。除了推定的G-斑点的位置,尿道和阴道壁衬里以外的宏观结构。具体而言,在前阴道壁中没有明显的勃起或“海绵状”组织,除非尿道邻接阴蒂的位置。临床意义不存在对应于推定的G点的解剖结构有助于阐明该主题的争议。本研究的优势和限制限制包括在死亡后立即对标本的有限访问以及观察偏见的潜力。此外,由于隐私原因,年龄,病史和死亡的原因无法发挥作出。然而,它是记录前阴道壁的解剖细节的最彻底和完整的解剖学评估之一。结论在其目前的描述中,G-斑点未被鉴定为尿道或阴道壁的宏观解剖的离散解剖实体。可以通过组织学研究提供进一步的见解。 HOAG N,KEED JR,O'CONNELL他。 “G-Spot”不是在阴道壁的宏观解剖解剖上明显的结构。 J SEX MED 2017; 14:1524-1532。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号