039 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs from Previously Identified Biofilm

M.S. Gross; C.C. Carson; S.K. Wilson; J.R. Delk

首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >039 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs from Previously Identified Biofilm

【24h】

039 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs from Previously Identified Biofilm

机译：039与事先研究相比，新数据显示修订版IPP手术中发现的细菌与先前鉴定的生物膜不同

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《The journal of sexual medicine》 |2017年第2期|共1页
作者
M.S. Gross; C.C. Carson; S.K. Wilson; J.R. Delk;
展开▼
作者单位

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center;

UNC School of Medicine;

Institute for Urologic Excellence;

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类性卫生;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. 039 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs from Previously Identified Biofilm [J] . M.S. Gross, C.C. Carson, S.K. Wilson, The journal of sexual medicine . 2017,第2期

机译：039与事先研究相比，新数据显示修订版IPP手术中发现的细菌与先前鉴定的生物膜不同
2. 161 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs From Previously Identified Biofilm [J] . M.S. Gross, C.C. Carson, S.K. Wilson, The journal of sexual medicine . 2017,第1期

机译：161与事先研究相比，新数据显示在修订IPP手术中发现的细菌与先前鉴定的生物膜不同
3. 161 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs From Previously Identified Biofilm [J] . M.S. Gross, C.C. Carson, S.K. Wilson, The journal of sexual medicine . 2017,第1期

机译：161与事先研究相比，新数据显示在修订IPP手术中发现的细菌与先前鉴定的生物膜不同
4. An auto contrast custom convolutional neural network to identifying Gram-negative bacteria [C] . Budi Dwi Satoto, Mohammad Imam Utoyo, Riries Rulaningtyas, International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia . 2020

机译：一种自动对比定制卷积神经网络，识别革兰氏阴性细菌
5. Fabrication of a definitive CAD/CAM titanium abutment prior to guided surgery: A pilot study [D] . Scruggs, William Patrick. 2015

机译：指导手术前确定的CAD / CAM钛基台的制造：一项初步研究
6. Bariatric surgery prior to total knee arthroplasty is not associated with lower risk of revision: a register-based study of 441 patients [O] . Perna Ighani Arani, Per Wretenberg, Johan Ottosson, 2020

机译：在整个膝盖关节置换术之前的畜牧手术与较低的修订风险无关：基于寄存器的441名患者的研究
7. The bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are usually performed manually. Recently, the number of samples has increased and the need for automatification has grown. BioMerieux has investigated Vitek2 for this purpose. HUSLAB has assigned us to compare the identification and antimicrobial results with respect to routine methods and Vitek2. Furthermore, we evaluate test reactions, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) production and the time what it takes to get results with Vitek2. In this study, we examined a total of 183 bacterial isolates including 76 ESBL-strains, 40 nonfermenting rods, 41 fastidious bacteria and 26 fresh clinical isolates. The results of routine methods were gathered from the patient database and following this, compared to the results given by Vitek2. Vitek2 correctly identified more than 96 f the ESBL-strains and fresh clinical isolates. The results of nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteri a were 70 oncordant with those of the routine methods. Test reaction results of Api20E were 94 nd Api20NE 70 n concordance with Vitek2 results. Approximately 80 f all Vitek2 antimicrobial results and 90 f ESBL test results were correct. Compared to earlier studies, Vitek2 performed the tests faster than the routine methods. These results suggest that Vitek2 is capable of giving rapid and accurate results. However, nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteria should be studied further. [O] . Järveläinen Marika, Roslund Iira, Silander Maarit 2006

机译：细菌鉴定和抗菌药敏试验通常是手动进行的。最近，样品的数量增加了，并且对自动化的需求也在增长。 BioMerieux为此进行了Vitek2的研究。 HUSLAB已指派我们比较常规方法和Vitek2的鉴定和抗菌结果。此外，我们还评估了测试反应，ESBL（扩展频谱β-内酰胺酶）的产生以及使用Vitek2获得结果所需的时间。在这项研究中，我们检查了总共183个细菌分离株，包括76个ESBL菌株，40个非发酵棒，41个营养细菌和26个新鲜临床分离株。从患者数据库中收集常规方法的结果，然后将其与Vitek2给出的结果进行比较。 Vitek2正确鉴定出超过96种ESBL菌株和新鲜的临床分离株。与常规方法相比，非发酵棒和精制细菌的结果为70。 Api20E的测试反应结果与Vitek2结果一致为94nd Api20NE 70 n。所有Vitek2抗菌结果约80 f和ESBL测试结果90 f正确。与早期的研究相比，Vitek2的测试速度快于常规方法。这些结果表明Vitek2能够给出快速而准确的结果。但是，应进一步研究非发酵棒和营养细菌。

039 In Contrast to Prior Study, New Data Shows Bacteria Found at Revision IPP Surgery Differs from Previously Identified Biofilm

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅