...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology >Contribution of nutrition science to the vitamin D field-Clarity or confusion?
【24h】

Contribution of nutrition science to the vitamin D field-Clarity or confusion?

机译:营养科学对维生素D场 - 清晰度或混乱的贡献?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent opinion pieces have questioned whether nutrition science is fit for purpose, suggesting that the evidence base for dietary recommendations is populated with poor quality science and unresolved controversy. Nutrition science is accused of not keeping up with the times and making little real-world progress to stem the growing global malnutrition crisis, by failing to apply cutting-edge techniques to nutrition problems. Nutritional epidemiology has been blamed for harming public health nutrition and the public perception of science itself, by selectively reporting biased, confounded data. Focussed on obesity and associated disorders and hunger, these articles do not refer to micronutrient deficiencies or advances in micronutrient research. There is a serious public health problem of low vitamin D status. Given that the field of vitamin D has experienced an exponential increase in peer-reviewed publications over the last 50 years, it seems timely that we take these cues to reflect upon whether the expanded body of scientific literature has contributed to a deeper knowledge of vitamin D in health and disease, leading to improved nutrition policy and patient care, or whether it has led to so much confusion and controversy that progress has been impeded. We consider whether the accusations of poor science and biased reporting levelled at nutrition science are evident within the vitamin D nutrition research area and whether they have compromised dietary recommendations for vitamin D. In evaluating whether reformation is required, we discuss the confusion and controversy within the field and signpost common ground within the vitamin D community. We outline vitamin D nutrition research that has presented strategies for vitamin D deficiency prevention within the population, particularly using food first approaches that could extend beyond high income settings to low- and middle-income countries. Finally, we encourage government and industry to implement technical advances and drive real-world progress.
机译:最近的意见作品质疑营养科学是否适合目的,这表明饮食建议的证据基础被群体质量科学和未解决的争议填补。营养科学被指控不跟上时代,通过未能将尖端技术应用于营养问题,使源于造型的全球营养不良危机的实际进展。通过选择性地报告偏见,混淆数据,营养流行病学被归咎于损害公共卫生营养和对科学本身的公众感知。侧重于肥胖症和相关的疾病和饥饿,这些文章不参考微量营养素缺陷或微量营养素研究进展。维生素D质量存在严重的公共卫生问题。鉴于维生素D领域在过去的50年里经历了同行评审出版物的指数增加,似乎是我们采取这些提示反映了科学文学的扩大机构是否有助于更深入地了解维生素D在健康和疾病中,导致营养政策和患者护理改善,或者是否导致了这种进展已经受阻的混淆和争议。我们考虑在维生素D营养研究区域内明显明显,在维生素D营养研究区域以及它们是否已经损害了维生素D的饮食建议。在评估是否需要改革方面,我们讨论了较改,我们在评估是否需要进行饮食方面,我们讨论了较困难和争议维生素D社区中的田间和路标共同接地。我们概述了维生素D营养研究,这些研究呈现了维生素D缺乏预防的策略,特别是使用可能将高收入环境延伸到低收入和中等收入国家的食物。最后,我们鼓励政府和行业实施技术进步并推动真实的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号