...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in therapy. >Binasal cannula versus face mask for oxygen therapy in patients with chronic pulmonary disease.
【24h】

Binasal cannula versus face mask for oxygen therapy in patients with chronic pulmonary disease.

机译:双鼻导管与面罩在慢性肺部疾病患者中进行氧气治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Oxygen therapy, which is ordered frequently for patients with chronic pulmonary disease, remains a cornerstone of modern medical practice. This study was conducted to compare the efficiency and comfort of a binasal cannula versus a face mask during oxygen therapy. Sixty hypoxemic patients participated in this randomized controlled study. While each patient was hypoxemic, arterial blood gas analysis was performed before oxygen supplementation was begun. Arterial oxygen saturation was continuously monitored during oxygen therapy with a face mask or a binasal cannula. Subjects were allowed to return to their oxygen saturation level in room air before the device for oxygen treatment was changed. The same procedure was then repeated with the other device. Patient comfort was evaluated through the use of a questionnaire that was completed after each treatment period. The mean age+/-standard deviation was 62+/-13 y. No statistically significant difference was noted in oxygen saturation levels achieved with the 2 devices. The binasal cannula reached target oxygen levels (P=.007) more quickly than the face mask. The binasal cannula was reported to be significantly more comfortable (P=.0001), and had significantly fewer reports of dyspnea and restlessness, and was less of a nuisance (P=.019, P=.0001, and P=.0001, respectively). The binasal cannula was preferred for oxygen therapy by 71% of study patients. Although the efficiency of the 2 devices did not differ remarkably, the binasal cannula was regarded as a more comfortable and time-saving device for delivery of oxygen therapy to hypoxic patients.
机译:对于慢性肺部疾病患者经常订购的氧气疗法仍然是现代医学实践的基石。进行这项研究的目的是比较氧气疗法期间双鼻导管和面罩的效率和舒适性。 60名低氧血症患者参加了这项随机对照研究。当每个患者均为低氧血症时,在开始补充氧气之前进行了动脉血气分析。在氧气治疗期间,使用面罩或双鼻插管连续监测动脉血氧饱和度。在更换氧气治疗设备之前,让受试者回到室内空气中的氧饱和度水平。然后,另一台设备重复相同的步骤。通过在每个治疗期后填写问卷,评估患者的舒适度。平均年龄+/-标准偏差为62 +/- 13y。用这两种装置达到的氧饱和度水平在统计学上没有显着差异。与面罩相比,双鼻插管达到目标氧气水平(P = .007)的速度更快。据报道,双鼻插管的舒适度显着提高(P = .0001),呼吸困难和躁动的报告显着减少,烦扰的发生率也降低了(P = .019,P = .0001和P = .0001,分别)。 71%的研究患者首选双鼻插管进行氧疗。尽管这两种设备的效率没有显着差异,但人们认为双鼻插管是一种向缺氧患者提供氧气治疗的更舒适,省时的设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号