首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Development Studies >How Do Legal Strategies Advance Social Accountability? Evaluating Mechanisms in Colombia
【24h】

How Do Legal Strategies Advance Social Accountability? Evaluating Mechanisms in Colombia

机译:法律策略如何推进社会责任? 评估哥伦比亚机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While prior studies have suggested that legal strategies offer promising tools for social accountability, the existing literature has not yet identified the underlying mechanisms that link legal strategies to accountability improvements. In this theory-building paper, we argue that there are four mechanisms by which legal strategies can enhance accountability. First, the courts can help those affected by policy failures to overcome the collective action problem. Second, courts can provide civil society with access to information about rights violations, malfeasance, and poor policy performance. Third, legal strategies can set in motion court-backed reforms that redress immediate rights violations and strengthen state capacity for more accountable governance. Fourth, court recognition can increase the symbolic and discursive resources of claimants, making their demands for accountability more effective. We illustrate these mechanisms through a comparative analysis of two policy arenas in Colombia, environment and healthcare - two areas in which civil society engagement with the judiciary opened up new routes for social accountability. By bridging the previously disconnected literatures on legal mobilisation and social accountability, this paper creates an analytical framework to understand the menu of options that citizens face about where and how to seek accountability from the state.
机译:虽然先前的研究表明,法律策略提供了有希望的社会责任工具,但现有的文献尚未确定将法律策略与问责制改善的潜在机制。在这个理论纸上,我们认为有四种机制,法律策略可以提高问责制。首先,法院可以帮助那些受政策失败影响的人来克服集体行动问题。其次,法院可以为民间社会提供有关权利侵权行为,渎职行为和政策绩效差的信息。第三,法律策略可以在议案法院支持的改革中,纠正立即侵犯权利和加强国家能力的更加负责治理。第四,法院承认可以增加索引索赔人的象征性和话语资源,使其对问责制的要求更有效。我们通过对哥伦比亚,环境和医疗保健的两项政策竞技场的比较分析来说明这些机制 - 公民社会与司法机构参与的两个领域开辟了新的社会责任航线。通过缩小以前的关于法律动员和社会问责制的先前断开的文献,本文创建了一个分析框架,了解公民面对的选项菜单以及如何从国家寻求问责制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号