首页> 外文期刊>Advances in urology >Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them
【24h】

Surgical Repair of Bulbar Urethral Strictures: Advantages of Ventral, Dorsal, and Lateral Approaches and When to Choose Them

机译:球囊尿道狭窄的外科手术修复:腹,背和外侧入路的优势以及何时选择它们

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. To review the available literature describing the three most common approaches for buccal mucosal graft (BMG) augmentation during reconstruction of bulbar urethral strictures. Due to its excellent histological properties, buccal mucosa graft is now routinely used in urethral reconstruction. The best approach for the placement of such a graft remains controversial. Methods. PubMed search was conducted for available English literature describing outcomes of bulbar urethroplasty augmentation techniques using dorsal, ventral, and lateral approaches. Prospective and retrospective studies as well as meta-analyses and latest systematic reviews were included. Results. Most of the studies reviewed are of retrospective nature and majority described dorsal or ventral approaches. Medium- and long-term outcomes of all three approaches were comparable ranging between 80 and 88%. Conclusion. Various techniques of BMG augmentation urethroplasty have been described for repairs of bulbar urethral strictures. In this review, we describe and compare the three most common "competing" approaches for bulbar urethroplasty with utilization of BMG.
机译:目标。回顾现有文献,描述在球根型尿道狭窄重建过程中颊粘膜移植(BMG)增强的三种最常见方法。由于其优良的组织学特性,现在颊粘膜移植物通常用于尿道重建。放置这种移植物的最佳方法仍存在争议。方法。 PubMed搜索了可用的英语文献,这些文献描述了使用背侧,腹侧和外侧入路的延髓式尿道成形术的效果。包括前瞻性和回顾性研究以及荟萃分析和最新的系统评价。结果。所审查的大多数研究具有回顾性,多数描述了背侧或腹侧入路。三种方法的中期和长期结果在80%到88%之间均具有可比性。结论。已经描述了BMG增大尿道成形术的各种技术以修复延髓性尿道狭窄。在这篇综述中,我们描述并比较了三种最常见的“竞争性”球囊成形术与BMG的“竞争”方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号