首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Robotic-Arm-Assisted vs Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Robotic-Arm-Assisted vs Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:机器人臂辅助与传统的单膝膝关节形成术。 随机对照试验的2年临床结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for treatment of medial compartment osteo-arthritis has potential benefits over total knee arthroplasty but UKA has a higher revision rate. Robotic-assisted UKA is increasingly common and offers more accurate implant positioning and limb alignment, lower early postoperative pain but evidence of functional outcome is lacking. The aim was to assess the clinical outcomes of a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial, comparing robotic-armassisted UKA with conventional surgery.
机译:背景:用于治疗内侧室骨质关节炎的单位膝关节关节术(UKA)对全膝关节间关节置换术的潜在益处,但UKA具有更高的修订率。 机器人辅助的UKA越来越普遍,提供更准确的植入物定位和肢体对齐,较低的术后疼痛,但缺乏功能结果的证据。 目的是评估单中心,前瞻性,随机对照试验的临床结果,将机器人盔甲与常规手术进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号