首页> 外文期刊>The Hastings Center report >Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges National and International Policy Challenges
【24h】

Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges National and International Policy Challenges

机译:在全球范围内的遗传基因组编辑:国家和国际政策挑战国家和国际政策挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract A central problem for the international governance of heritable germline gene editing is that there are important differences in attitudes and values as well as ethical and health care considerations around the world. These differences are reflected in a complicated and diverse regulatory landscape. Several publications have discussed whether reproductive uses would be legally permissible in individual countries and whether clinical applications could emerge in the context of regulatory gaps and gray areas. Systematic comparative studies that explore issues related to the governance of this technology from different national and international perspectives are needed to address the lack of knowledge in this area. In this research report, we contribute to filling this gap by presenting views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom on challenges to the governance of heritable genome editing. We present findings from a multistakeholder study conducted in the United Kingdom between October 2016 and January 2018 and funded by the Wellcome Trust. This research included interviews, literature analysis, and a workshop. We involved leading U.K. scientists, in vitro fertilization clinicians, and representatives from regulatory bodies, patient organizations, and other civil societal organizations, as well as fertility companies. Part one of this article explores stakeholder perceptions of possible global developments in heritable genome editing and associated risks and governance challenges. Part two presents a range of policy options that were generated during the workshop in relation to the challenges discussed in part one .
机译:摘要国际治理遗传性系基因编辑的核心问题是,世界各地都存在重要差异以及世界各地的伦理和医疗保健思想。这些差异反映在复杂和多样化的监管景观中。若干出版物已经讨论了在各个国家的生殖用途是否在法律上允许在监管间隙和灰色地区的背景下出现临床应用。探索与不同国家和国际观点的治理有关的系统的系统性比较研究是为了解决这一领域缺乏知识。在这份研究报告中,我们通过在联合王国的利益攸关方提出对遗传基因组编辑治理挑战的挑战来填补这一差距。我们从2016年10月和2018年1月之间向英国进行的多利益相关方研究表明,并由Wellcome Trust资助。本研究包括访谈,文学分析和研讨会。我们涉及领先的U.K.科学家,体外施肥临床医生,以及监管机构,患者组织和其他民间社会组织以及生育公司的代表。本文中的一部分探讨了利益相关者对可能的全球性发展中可能的全球发展和相关的风险和治理挑战的看法。第二部分介绍了一系列在研讨会期间产生的政策选择,与第一个讨论的挑战有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号