...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Forestry Review >Dissenting voices in a consenting village: lessons from implementation of free, prior and informed consent at a REDD plus pilot in Tanzania
【24h】

Dissenting voices in a consenting village: lessons from implementation of free, prior and informed consent at a REDD plus pilot in Tanzania

机译:同意村的声音:从坦桑尼亚的Redd加上飞行员实施自由,先前和知情同意的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) is a key institutional tool in meeting social safeguards. Its implementation ensures respect of the local people's rights in an intervention. This paper presents a case of FPIC implementation at a REDD+ pilot site. Data were obtained through key informant interviews and focus group discussions with proponents and village members of the Lindi REDD+ project. Findings indicate that the inclusive approach to FPIC by taking the consultations to the hamlet level did not deliver a flawless process. The consent decision was reached by a majority vote, not consensus. There was some dissent, prompting the early establishment of project implementation committees. Consent was obtained, though it was not absolutely free, prior and informed. Future REDD+ projects should consider having FPIC as an independent and earlier process, separate from the main implementation of the project in order to uphold local peoples' rights in a less anxious process.
机译:免费,事先和知情同意(FPIC)是满足社会保障的主要制度工具。 其实施确保了尊重当地人民在干预中的权利。 本文呈现了REDD +试点网站的FPIC实现。 通过与Lindi Redd +项目的支持者和村庄成员的关键信息访谈和焦点小组讨论获得数据。 调查结果表明,通过将磋商与哈姆雷特级别的磋商没有提供完美的过程。 多数票达成了同意决定,而不是共识。 有一些异议,促使项目实施委员会的早期建立。 获得了同意,虽然它并非绝对免费,先前并通知。 未来的REDD +项目应考虑将FPIC作为一个独立和更早的过程,与项目的主要实施分开,以维护当地人民在不太焦虑的过程中的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号