首页> 外文期刊>The journal of alternative and complementary medicine: research on paradigm, practice, and policy >Statutory Regulation of Traditional Medicine Practitioners and Practices: The Need for Distinct Policy Making Guidelines
【24h】

Statutory Regulation of Traditional Medicine Practitioners and Practices: The Need for Distinct Policy Making Guidelines

机译:传统医学从业者和实践的法定调节:截然不同的政策准则需要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for the increased statutory regulation of traditional and complementary medicine practitioners and practices, currently implemented in about half of nations surveyed. According to recent WHO data, however, the absence of policy guidelines in this area represents a significant barrier to implementation of such professional regulations. This commentary reviews several key challenges that distinguish the statutory regulation of traditional medicine practitioners and practices from biomedical professional regulation, providing a foundation for the development of policy making parameters in this area. Foremost in this regard are the ongoing impacts of the European colonial encounter, which reinforce biomedicine's disproportionate political dominance across the globe despite traditional medicine's ongoing widespread use (particularly in the global South). In this light, the authors discuss the conceptual and historical underpinnings of contemporary professional regulatory structures, the tensions between institutional and informal traditional medicine training pathways, and the policy challenges presented by the prospect of standardizing internally diverse indigenous healing approaches. Epistemic and evidentiary tensions, as well as the policy complexities surrounding the intersection of cultural and clinical considerations, present additional challenges to regulators. Conceptualizing professional regulation as an intellectual property claim under the law, the authors further consider what it means to protect traditional knowledge and prevent misappropriation in this context. Overall, the authors propose that innovative professional regulatory approaches are needed in this area to address safety, quality of care, and accessibility as key public interest concerns, while prioritizing the redress of historical inequities, protection of diverse indigenous knowledges, and delivery of care to underserved populations.
机译:世界卫生组织(世卫组织)呼吁增加对传统和互补医学从业人员和实践的法定监管,目前在调查的一半国家实施。然而,根据近期世卫组织的数据,该领域的政策指导方针缺乏政策指导是对执行此类专业法规的重大障碍。该评论评估若干关键挑战,将传统医学从业人员和实践的法定调节从生物医学专业规范中区分,为该地区的政策制定参数提供了基础。在这方面最重要的是欧洲殖民地遭遇的持续影响,尽管传统医学正在进行的广泛使用(特别是在全球南部),仍然可以加强生物医学的政治统治地位。在这方面,作者讨论了当代职业监管结构的概念和历史下划线,制度与非正式传统医学培训途径之间的紧张关系,以及规范内部多种土着治疗方法的前景所提出的政策挑战。认知和证据紧张局势,以及文化和临床考虑因素周围的政策复杂性,对监管机构带来了额外的挑战。概念化专业规范作为法律下的知识产权索赔,进一步考虑保护传统知识并防止在这种情况下挪用挪用的意义。总体而言,作者提出了在这方面需要创新的专业监管方法,以解决安全,护理质量和可访问性作为关键的公共利益问题,同时优先考虑历史不公平的纠正,保护多样化的土着知识,以及提供护理欠缺的人口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号