...
首页> 外文期刊>The international journal of artificial organs >Microhardness and water solubility of expired and non-expired shelf-life composites
【24h】

Microhardness and water solubility of expired and non-expired shelf-life composites

机译:过期和非过期货架 - 生活复合材料的微硬度和水溶性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the Vickers hardness and water solubility of expired and non-expired shelf-life bulk-fill and conventional dental composite material. Methods: Four different expired (E) (after 6 months) and non-expired (N) shelf-life composite resin materials (Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Enamel, Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Dentin, Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, and Tetric N-Ceram) were used. For each tested material, seven specimens were prepared and polymerized with a light curing unit. Vickers hardness measurements were made on the top and bottom surfaces. For the water sorption test, initially all specimens were weighted, the thickness and diameter of each specimen were measured, and the average volume of specimen was calculated. Then, each specimen was immersed in distilled water and kept in an incubator for 7 days and finally weighed again. Results: There was not any statistically significant difference between the microhardness results of expired and non-expired shelf-life composites on the top and bottom surfaces (p 0.05). No significant difference was determined between the non-expired shelf-life composite materials on the top surfaces (p 0.05). Non-expired Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Dentin showed lower microhardness than non-expired Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill and non-expired Tetric N-Ceram on the bottom surface (p 0.05). Expired Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Dentin showed lower microhardness results than expired Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill on the top and bottom surfaces (p 0.05). There was not any significant difference between the water sorption results of expired and non-expired shelf-life composites (p 0.05). Expired Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Dentin showed higher water sorption than expired Tetric N-Ceram E-TN (p 0.05). Conclusion: Expiration date did not affect the microhardness and water sorption of bulk-fill and conventional composites. The hardness and water sorption of the composite materials varied depending on the type of composites.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是确定过期和非过期保质寿命堆积和常规牙科复合材料的维氏硬度和水溶解度。方法:四种不同的过期(e)(e)(6个月后)和非过期(n)保质期复合树脂材料(Clearfil Majesty Es-2搪瓷,Clearfil Majesty ES-2牙本质,Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill,以及使用了tetric n-ceram。对于每个测试材料,使用光固化单元制备七个样品并聚合。维氏硬度测量在顶部和底部表面上进行。对于水吸附试验,最初加权所有样品,测量每个样本的厚度和直径,并计算样品的平均体积。然后,将每个样品浸入蒸馏水中并在培养箱中保持7天,最后再次称重。结果:顶部和底表面上的过期和非过期保质寿命复合材料的显微硬度结果没有任何统计学意义(P&GT; 0.05)。在顶表面上的非过期保质期复合材料(P&GT 0.05)之间没有确定显着差异。非过期的Clearfil Majesty ES-2牙本霉素显示出比非过期的Tetric N-Ceram体积填充和底表面上的非过期的Tetric N-Ceram(P <0.05)。已过期的Clearfil Majesty ES-2牙本质显示出低硬度结果,而不是到期的Tetric N-Ceram体积填充在顶部和底表面上(P <0.05)。过期和非过期保质期复合材料的水吸附结果(P> 0.05)没有任何显着差异。已过期的Clearfil Majesty ES-2牙本霉素显示出比过期的Tetric N-Ceram E-Tn(P <0.05)较高的吸水吸附。结论:到期日期不影响批量填充和常规复合材料的显微硬度和水吸附。复合材料的硬度和水吸附根据复合材料的类型而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号