首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of health planning and management >Health system strengthening—Reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge
【24h】

Health system strengthening—Reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge

机译:卫生系统加强对其意义,评估和知识状态的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Comprehensive reviews of health system strengthening (HSS) interventions are rare, partly because of lack of clarity on definitions of the term but also the potentially huge scale of the evidence. We reflect on the process of undertaking such an evidence review recently, drawing out suggestions on definitions of HSS and approaches to assessment, as well as summarising some key conclusions from the current evidence base. The key elements of a clear definition include, in our view, consideration of scope (with effects cutting across building blocks in practice, even if not in intervention design, and also tackling more than one disease), scale (having national reach and cutting across levels of the system), sustainability (effects being sustained over time and addressing systemic blockages), and effects (impacting on health outcomes, equity, financial risk protection, and responsiveness). We also argue that agreeing a framework for design and evaluation of HSS is urgent. Most HSS interventions have theories of change relating to specific system blocks, but more work is needed on capturing their spillover effects and their contribution to meeting overarching health system process goals. We make some initial suggestions about such goals, to reflect the features that characterise a “strong health system.” We highlight that current findings on “what works” are just indicative, given the limitations and biases in what has been studied and how, and argue that there is need to rethink evaluation methods for HSS beyond finite interventions and narrow outcomes. Clearer concepts, frameworks, and methods can support more coherent HSS investment.
机译:总结卫生系统的综合评论加强(HSS)干预措施是罕见的,部分原因是缺乏对术语的定义的清晰度,而且还有巨大的证据规模。我们反映了最近进行此类证据审查的过程,提出了关于HSS和评估方法的定义的建议,以及总结当前证据基础的一些关键结论。明确定义的关键要素包括我们认为,考虑范围(在实践中跨越构建块的影响,即使不在干预设计中,也要解决多种疾病),规模(具有国家范围和削减系统水平),可持续性(效果随着时间的推移和解决系统障碍),以及影响健康结果,股权,财务风险保护和响应性)。我们还认为,同意HSS的设计和评估框架是紧迫的。大多数HSS干预都有与特定系统块有关的变化的理论,但需要更多的工作来捕获他们的溢出效应及其对会议总体卫生系统进程目标的贡献。我们对这些目标进行了一些初步建议,以反映特征“强健体系”的特征。我们强调了当前关于“什么作品”的调查结果只是指示的,鉴于已经研究的局限性和偏见,并且争论如何重新考虑HSS超出有限干预和狭窄结果的升级方法。更清晰的概念,框架和方法可以支持更多连贯的HSS投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号