...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Journal of Agronomy >Energy saving and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa) under mechanized and conventional system of rice intensification
【24h】

Energy saving and profitability of rice (Oryza sativa) under mechanized and conventional system of rice intensification

机译:稻米电力和常规水稻强化系统中水稻(Oryza Sativa)的节能和盈利能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy seasons of 2013 and 2014 at Hyderabad, Telangana, to evaluate the effect of mechanized and conventional system of rice (Oryza sativa L.) intensification. From the 2 years data, significantly higher grbssenergy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity were recorded with system of rice intensification (SRI) over mechanized system of rice intensification (MSRI). Energy-use efficieffcy, energy productivity and energy intensity recorded were significantly higher with irrigation at 3 days after disappearance of pounded water (DADPW) and these were at par with saturation treatment. Nitrogen application based on leaf colour chart (LCC) recorded higher gross energy output, net energy, energy-use efficiency, energy productivity and energy intensity in economic terms as compared to other nitrogen management practices. MSRI and SRI performed equally better with respect to benefit: cost ratio. Considerably higher gross and net returns were obtained with SRI as compared to MSRI. The labour saving was 21-25% higher with MSRI than SRI. Irrigation at 3 DADPW recorded significantly higher net returns and benefit: cost ratio, which was comparable with saturation treatment. Gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio, were significantly higher with nitrogen application based on LCC, except soil test crop response based nitrogen application.
机译:在2013年和2014年的雨季,在Hyderabad,Telangana进行了一个田间实验,以评估机械化和常规水稻(Oryza Sativa L.)强化的影响。从2年来,通过稻米强化机械化系统(MSRI)的水稻强化(SRI)制度,记录了净能量输出,净能源,能源利用效率,能源生产率和能源强度。能量使用效率,记录的能量生产率和能量强度在捣碎水(DADPW)消失后3天的灌溉显着升高,这些灌溉在饱和处理中。与其他氮管理实践相比,基于叶子颜色图(LCC)的氮施用较高的总能量输出,净能源,能源利用效率,能源生产率和能源强度。 MSRI和SRI相对于益处的同样更好:成本比率。与MSRI相比,使用SRI获得了相当高的总批量和净返回。 MSRI比SRI更高的劳动力节省21-25%。 3 DADPW的灌溉记录了净回报和益处的显着较高:成本比率,与饱和处理相当。基于LCC的氮应用,除土壤试验作物响应的氮施用外,总回报率,净返回和益处 - 成本比率显着高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号