首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Social Psychology >Is a system motive really necessary to explain the system justification effect? A response to Jost (2019) and Jost, Badaan, Goudarzi, Hoffarth, and Mogami (2019)
【24h】

Is a system motive really necessary to explain the system justification effect? A response to Jost (2019) and Jost, Badaan, Goudarzi, Hoffarth, and Mogami (2019)

机译:系统动机是否真正有必要解释系统理由效应? 对Jost(2019)和Jost,Badaan,Goudarzi,Hoffarth和Mogami(2019)的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The debate between the proponents of SIMSA and SJT does not pivot on whether system justification occurs - we all agree that system justification does occur. The issue is why it occurs? System justification theory (SJT; Jost & Banaji, 1994, British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1) assumes that system justification is motivated by a special system justification motive. In contrast, the social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA; Owuamalam, Rubin, & Spears, , Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 2) argues that there is insufficient conclusive evidence for this special system motive, and that system justification can be explained in terms of social identity motives, including the motivation to accurately reflect social reality and the search for a positive social identity. Here, we respond to criticisms of SIMSA, including criticisms of its social reality, ingroup bias, and hope for future ingroup status explanations of system justification. We conclude that SJT theorists should decide whether system justification is oppositional to, or compatible with social identity motives, and that this dilemma could be resolved by relinquishing the theoretically problematic notion of a system justification motivation.
机译:Simsa和SJT的支持者之间的辩论不会追溯系统理由是否发生 - 我们都同意系统理由确实发生。问题是它发生的原因?制度理论(SJT; Jost&Banaji,1994,英国社会心理学,33,19,13,1)假设系统理由受到特殊制度理由动机的动机。相比之下,系统态度的社会认同模型(Simsa; Oumamalam,Rubin和Spears,心理学科学的当前方向,27,2)认为,这种特殊制度动机的确凿证据是不够的,而系统理由可以是在社会认同动机方面解释,包括准确反映社会现实的动机和寻求积极的社会形式。在这里,我们回应对辛莎的批评,包括对其社会现实,Ingroup偏见的批评,并希望未来的Ingroup状态解释系统理由。我们得出结论,SJT理论家应决定系统理由是否与社会认同动机反对或兼容,并且通过放弃系统理论激励的理论问题概念,可以解决这种困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号