...
首页> 外文期刊>Urologia internationalis >Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Laser versus Cold Knife Urethrotomy in the Management of Patients with Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
【24h】

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Laser versus Cold Knife Urethrotomy in the Management of Patients with Urethral Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

机译:评估激光与冷刀尿道术治疗尿道狭窄患者的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的系统审查与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Urethral strictures generate great morbidity. Two procedures have been described for their management - laser and cold knife techniques - which are still widely used. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of laser versus cold knife urethrotomy. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane databases and gray literature. Primary outcomes were urethral stricture recurrence, time-to-recurrence and complication rate. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax). Data analysis was obtained using Review Manager 5.2. Results: Out of 137 publications, 4 articles were included in the meta-analysis. At 3 months, the recurrence rate was similar in both groups (0.55, 95% CI 0.18-1.66), but at 6 and 12 months, it was significantly lower in the laser urethrotomy group (0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.81 and 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75). The analysis of Qmax at 6 months post-intervention suggested a greater improvement in the laser urethrotomy group. A qualitative analysis showed that complications in both procedures were minor and infrequent. Conclusions: Laser urethrotomy has a lower recurrence rate at 6 and 12 months compared to cold knife urethrotomy. Complications in both procedures are minor and infrequent. Results should be interpreted cautiously, since they were evaluated only for a short term. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:简介:尿道狭窄产生了巨大的发病率。已经针对其管理 - 激光和冷刀技术描述了两种程序 - 仍然广泛使用。我们的目标是评估激光与冷刀尿道术的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:我们使用Medline,Embase,Lilacs和Cochrane数据库和灰色文献进行了对文献的系统搜索。主要结果是尿道狭窄复发,复发时间和并发症率。二次结果是生活质量和最大尿流率(Qmax)。使用审核经理5.2获得数据分析。结果:在137个出版物中,荟萃分析中包含4篇文章。在3个月时,两组的复发率相似(0.55,95%CI 0.18-1.66),但在6和12个月内,激光尿道术基团(0.39,95%CI 0.19-0.81和0.44)显着降低,95%CI 0.26-0.75)。介入后6个月的Qmax分析表明激光尿道术群体的改善性更大。定性分析表明,两种程序中的并发症都很轻微,不常见。结论:与冷刀尿道术相比,激光尿道尿道术在6和12个月内具有较低的复发率。两种程序的并发症很小,不常见。结果应谨慎解释,因为它们仅在短期内评估。 (c)2017年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号