首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary Science Reviews: The International Multidisciplinary Review Journal >Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls
【24h】

Peak analysis of sedimentary charcoal records: Some underlying assumptions and potential pitfalls

机译:沉积木炭记录的峰值分析:一些潜在的假设和潜在陷阱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Fire histories are derived from sedimentary charcoal sequences using a suite of statistical techniques that has become increasingly complex. Here we outline the various assumptions that underpin these methods, and highlight potential sources of error that must be considered. We hope to spur debate on the circumstances in which such methods are appropriate, and highlight areas needing further research. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:消防历史使用诸如越来越复杂的统计技术套件衍生自沉积木炭序列。 在这里,我们概述了支撑这些方法的各种假设,并突出必须考虑的潜在错误来源。 我们希望审查这些方法适当的情况的辩论,并强调需要进一步研究的地区。 (c)2019年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号