首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatics >Decisional and Dispositional Capacity Determinations: Neuropsychiatric Illness and an Integrated Clinical Paradigm
【24h】

Decisional and Dispositional Capacity Determinations: Neuropsychiatric Illness and an Integrated Clinical Paradigm

机译:果断和拟议能力测定:神经精神疾病和综合临床范式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Assessment of decisional capacity requires thorough clinical review of a patient’s current psychiatric symptoms and cognitive processes. The assessment to determine the patient’s capacity for self-management postdischarge is a different clinical concept from decisional capacity. Objectives Standardized guidelines for capacity determinations (both for informed consent and for disposition) would be helpful to clinicians, patients, and their caregivers. Method The authors reviewed the recent clinical literature on neuropsychiatric illnesses associated with impaired decisional capacity, as well as for the term “dispositional capacity.” Results Neurocognitive disorders and neurologic disorders are commonly associated with impaired decisional capacity; other psychiatric illnesses are less commonly associated. There were no articles identified that used the term “dispositional capacity” to describe a subtype of decisional capacity determination. No definition or guidelines for determination of dispositional capacity were found. Conclusions Routine evaluation for neurocognitive disorders including standardized cognitive assessment should be included in decisional capacity determinations. There is a need for a new subtype of decisional capacity determination, for which we propose the term “dispositional capacity.” This concept is introduced and defined. For dispositional capacity determinations, supplementation of the usual decisional capacity evaluation with in vivo demonstration of self-management skills is recommended. Decisional and dispositional capacity determination is conceptualized with a biopsychosociocultural approach and guidelines for standardized assessment are presented.
机译:背景技术对抗议能力的评估需要对患者目前的精神病症状和认知过程进行彻底临床审查。确定患者自我管理后收费能力的评估是判决能力的不同临床概念。目标能力确定标准化指南(对于知情同意书和处置而言,两者都有助于临床医生,患者及其护理人员。方法作者审查了近期与抗议能力受损相关的神经精神疾病的临床文献,以及术语“处置能力”。结果神经认知障碍和神经系统疾病通常与抗议能力受损;其他精神疾病较不常见。没有确定的文章,使用术语“性能”术语来描述判决能力测定的亚型。未发现确定性能的定义或指导方针。结论应包括标准化认知评估,包括标准化认知评估的神经认知障碍的常规评估应包括在抵决能力测定中。需要一种毁灭性能力确定的新亚型,我们提出了“处置能力”一词。介绍和定义了这个概念。对于处方能力测定,建议补充常规抵抗能力评估,以体内展示自我管理技能。果断和拟议能力测定概念化,并概念性化,并提出了标准化评估的指导方针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号