...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of the American Psychosomatic Society >Coronary Artery Spasm as Related to Anxiety and Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
【24h】

Coronary Artery Spasm as Related to Anxiety and Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

机译:冠状动脉痉挛与焦虑和抑郁有关:全国范围的人口研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective Anxiety and depression are risk factors for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but their effects on coronary artery spasm (CAS) remain unestablished. Methods Patient records in this population-based study were retrospectively collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Using propensity score matching, we used 1:1:1 ratio stratification into a control group of 10,325 individuals without CAS or CAD, a CAS group comprising 10,473 patients, and a CAD group comprising 10,473 patients during 2000-2012. Results The prevalence of CAS and CAD was 0.067% and 8.7%, respectively, in the general population. The prevalence of anxiety and depression diagnoses was significantly higher in patients with new-onset CAS than in those with new-onset CAD and controls without CAS/CAD, even after propensity score matching. Compared with CAD, anxiety and depression diagnoses conferred a higher risk of developing CAS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14-2.45, p < .001, and OR = 1.34, 95% CI, 1.08-1.66, p = .007, respectively). The association was even stronger when comparing CAS with the control group without CAD or CAS (OR = 5.20, 95% CI, 4.72-5.74, p < .001, and OR = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.50-2.62, p < .001, respectively). The increased risk of new-onset CAS as related to previous anxiety and depression diagnoses was comparable between males and females. Conclusions Compared with CAD or the general population, anxiety and depression diagnoses confer a higher risk of developing CAS. No sex differences are found for the association of anxiety and depression with CAS.
机译:客观焦虑和抑郁是阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的危险因素,但它们对冠状动脉痉挛(CAS)的影响仍然未成立。方法从台湾国家健康保险研究数据库回顾性收集了基于群体的研究中的患者记录。使用倾向得分匹配,我们使用1:1:1将分层分层成10,325名没有CA或CAD的对照组,该CAS组包含10,473名患者,并在2000-2012期间包含10,473名患者的CAD组。结果普通人口中CAS和CAD的患病率分别为0.067%和8.7%。患有新发病CAS的患者的焦虑和抑郁症诊断的患病率显着高于在没有CAS / CAD的新出生CAD和对照中的那些,即使在倾向分数匹配之后也是如此。与CAD相比,焦虑和抑郁症诊断赋予发育CAS的较高风险(差异[或] = 2.29,95%置信区间[CI],2.14-2.45,P <.001,以及或= 1.34,95%CI, 1.08-1.66,p = .007,分别)。当与没有CAD或CAS的对照组比较CAS(或= 5.20,95%CI,4.72-5.74,P <.001,或= 1.98,95%CI,1.50-2.62,P <。 001分别)。与先前焦虑和抑郁症有关的新发芽CA的风险增加在雄性和女性之间是可比的。结论与CAD或一般人群相比,焦虑和抑郁症诊断赋予发展中异体较高的风险。 CAS与焦虑和抑郁协会没有发现性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号